...
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian red crescent medical journal >Mapping Catquest Scores onto EQ-5D Utility Values in Patients With Cataract Disease
【24h】

Mapping Catquest Scores onto EQ-5D Utility Values in Patients With Cataract Disease

机译:在白内障患者中将Catquest得分映射到EQ-5D效用值

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Mapping from non-performance-based measures onto generic performance-based measures provides an appropriate solution to derive utilities to be used in economic evaluations. Objectives: This study aimed to create a model through which EQ-5D utilities for cataracts can be obtained from scores on the disease-specific Catquest measure. Patients and Methods: One hundred ninety-nine observations from 103 patients who self-administered the EQ-5D, the Catquest and questions on demographic and clinical characteristics were included in the analysis. Data was divided into estimation and validation datasets. To predict EQ-5D utilities, multiple regression analysis, using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and the censored least absolute deviation (CLAD), was performed. Catquest scores, age, gender, and performing surgery were included as explanatory variables. An estimation dataset was used to derive the coefficients, and these coefficients were then validated using a validation dataset. Based on the explanatory power, the consistency, the simplicity, the mean absolute error (MAE) and the correlations between observed and fitted utilities, the most appropriate model was selected. Results: The mean EQ-5D and Catquest scores of the total sample were 0.631 and 15.8, respectively. Age and surgery showed no significant effect for either method. Removing age and surgery, model II was built and given an R2 of 0.697, an MAE of 0.1176 for the OLS and an R2 of 0.614, and an MAE of 0.1153 for the CLAD method. In the validation stage, the CLAD revealed better prediction ability, with an MAE of 0.198 versus an MAE of 0.209 for the OLS. ICC and Bland-Altman analysis put the CLAD as a preferred method with the following equation: Utilities (EQ-5D) = 0.988 - 0.0281 × Catquest (PD) + 0.102 × gender (male = 1). Conclusions:
机译:背景:从非基于绩效的指标到基于通用绩效的指标的映射提供了一种合适的解决方案,可以得出可用于经济评估的效用。目标:这项研究旨在创建一个模型,通过该模型可以从特定疾病的Catquest测评得分获得白内障EQ-5D实用程序。患者和方法:这项分析包括103例自我管理EQ-5D,Catquest以及有关人口统计学和临床​​特征的问题的109例观察结果。数据分为估计和验证数据集。为了预测EQ-5D效用,使用普通最小二乘(OLS)和审查的最小绝对偏差(CLAD)进行了多元回归分析。 Catquest得分,年龄,性别和进行手术均作为解释变量。使用估计数据集导出系数,然后使用验证数据集对这些系数进行验证。基于解释力,一致性,简单性,平均绝对误差(MAE)以及观测到的效用和拟合的效用之间的相关性,选择了最合适的模型。结果:总样本的平均EQ-5D和Catquest得分分别为0.631和15.8。年龄和手术对这两种方法均无明显影响。除去年龄和手术,建立了模型II,模型的R2为0.697,OLS的MAE为0.1176,CLAD方法的R2为0.614,MAE为0.1153。在验证阶段,CLAD显示出更好的预测能力,相对于OLS,MAE为0.198,而MAE为0.209。 ICC和Bland-Altman分析将CLAD作为具有以下等式的首选方法:公用事业(EQ-5D)= 0.988-0.0281×Catquest(PD)+ 0.102×性别(男性= 1)。结论:

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号