首页> 外文期刊>Education Sciences >To What Extent do Biology Textbooks Contribute to Scientific Literacy? Criteria for Analysing Science-Technology-Society-Environment Issues
【24h】

To What Extent do Biology Textbooks Contribute to Scientific Literacy? Criteria for Analysing Science-Technology-Society-Environment Issues

机译:生物学教科书对科学素养有多大贡献?分析科学,技术,社会,环境问题的标准

获取原文
           

摘要

Our article proposes a set of six criteria for analysing science-technology-society-environment (STSE) issues in regular textbooks as to how they are expected to contribute to students’ scientific literacy. We chose genetics and gene technology as fields prolific in STSE issues. We derived our criteria (including 26 sub-criteria) from a literature review of the debate in science education on how to increase scientific literacy. We inspected the textbooks regarding the relationships between science, technology, society, and environment, and considered the presence of the decontextualized and socially neutral view of science as distorted view. We, qualitatively and quantitatively, applied our set of criteria to two German Biology textbooks and identified, in total, 718 STSE statements. Based on the frequencies of different criteria and sub-criteria in the textbooks, we drew conclusions concerning STSE issues and the underlying conceptions of science and technology, which might hinder the furtherance of scientific literacy. The applicability of our approach in other science education contexts is discussed.
机译:本文提出了一套六个标准,用于分析常规教科书中的科学,技术,社会,环境(STSE)问题,以期它们有望如何促进学生的科学素养。我们选择遗传学和基因技术作为解决STSE问题的领域。我们从有关科学教育关于如何提高科学素养的辩论的文献综述中得出了我们的标准(包括26个子标准)。我们检查了有关科学,技术,社会和环境之间关系的教科书,并认为脱机化和社会中立的科学观点的存在是扭曲的观点。我们定性和定量地将我们的标准应用于两本德国生物学教科书,总共确定了718条STSE陈述。根据教科书中不同标准和子标准的出现频率,我们得出有关STSE问题和潜在的科学技术概念的结论,这可能会阻碍科学素养的发展。讨论了我们的方法在其他科学教育环境中的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号