首页> 外文期刊>Education Sciences >Insights into Components of Prospective Science Teachers’ Mental Models and Their Preferred Visual Representations of Atoms
【24h】

Insights into Components of Prospective Science Teachers’ Mental Models and Their Preferred Visual Representations of Atoms

机译:深入了解准理科教师心理模型的组成及其首选的原子视觉表示

获取原文
       

摘要

This study focused on determining the elements of mental models of atomic structure and views on visual representations of models of atomic structure in two sub-cohorts of student teachers studying at a university in Turkey. In total, 141 student teachers participated in this study. In the first cohort, the focus was on 73 freshman science student teachers’ drawings of mental models of atomic structure. The analysis showed a wide variety of individual aspects in the students’ minds when asked to sketch the structure of atoms. The majority of students preferred to draw two-dimensional structures, neglecting the atom’s space-filling character. Concerning the details of atomic structure, the majority of students emphasized only the most essential components of atoms, namely protons, neutrons, and electrons. It was quickly recognizable that these elements were arranged according to different analogies or representations of historical models, particularly related to Bohr’s atomic theory and different representations thereof. Overall, the different visual representations of atomic models the students see in school, almost exclusively serve as the basis for their ideas about atomic structure. Current atomic theory, like quantum mechanical models, are generally not used when students are asked for a “contemporary” model of atoms. Rather it seems that concreteness and functionality are the primary factors leading to the selection of an atomic model when requested. This study is supplemented by data collected from the second cohort of 68 prospective teachers consisting of a diverse group of students ranging from freshman to senior level. The students in this cohort were asked for their preferred illustrations of atoms in textbooks. Open-ended questions about atoms led to further insights. The analysis of the prospective teachers’ drawings indicated that a more careful approach to teaching is necessary to clarify the relationships between different models of atomic structure and to allow students to understand what an appropriate and contemporary understanding of atomic structure should encompass.
机译:这项研究的重点是确定原子结构的心理模型的要素,以及在土耳其的一所大学学习的两个子教师小组中,对原子结构模型的视觉表示的看法。共有141名学生教师参加了这项研究。在第一个队列中,重点是73名新生的理科生教师绘制的原子结构心理模型图。当被要求勾勒出原子的结构时,分析显示了学生脑海中的各个方面。大多数学生都喜欢绘制二维结构,而忽略了原子的空间填充特性。关于原子结构的细节,大多数学生只强调原子最重要的成分,即质子,中子和电子。很快就认识到这些元素是根据历史模型的不同类比或表示来安排的,特别是与玻尔的原子理论及其不同表示有关的元素。总体而言,学生在学校看到的原子模型的不同视觉表示几乎完全是他们关于原子结构的思想的基础。当要求学生提供原子的“当代”模型时,通常不使用当前的原子理论,例如量子力学模型。相反,似乎具体性和功能性是导致在请求时选择原子模型的主要因素。这项研究得到了来自第二批68位准教师的数据的补充,这些数据包括从新生到高年级的各种学生。这个队列的学生被要求在教科书中提供他们喜欢的原子插图。关于原子的开放性问题引发了进一步的见解。对准教师绘画的分析表明,有必要采取更加谨慎的教学方法,以阐明原子结构不同模型之间的关系,并使学生了解对原子结构应有的适当的当代理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号