首页> 外文期刊>Education Inquiry >Is “Excellent” good enough?
【24h】

Is “Excellent” good enough?

机译:“优秀”够好吗?

获取原文

摘要

Both national and international evaluation studies have criticised Norwegian teachers for not being sufficiently specific and learning-oriented in their feedback practice. The feedback is largely characterised by general comments such as “Excellent” and “Good work”, and less by feed-forwardoriented messages informing students about what to do to improve their learning. In this paper we examine teachers’ feedback practice as part of a 3-year research and development project in two Norwegian primary schools. The students involved cover ages 9 to 12. Through the study we have aimed to develop a deeper understanding of how assessment practices among teachers are developed during practice and in dialogue with theory and research evidence, with a particular emphasis on how the teachers differentiated their teaching in relation to students with different abilities. The findings suggest that the teachers provide little and vague learning promoting to low-achieving students. It appears that these students most often receive feedback that is meant to strengthen their self-efficacy, rather than informative learning-oriented, feed-forward comments. A key question seems to be how to help those students in order to empower them as self-regulated learners.
机译:国家和国际评估研究都批评挪威教师在反馈实践中不够具体和以学习为导向。反馈的主要特征是具有“出色”和“出色表现”之类的一般性评论,而较少具有前馈性的信息来告知学生有关如何改进学习的信息。在本文中,我们研究了挪威两所小学为期3年的研究与开发项目中教师反馈的做法。参与研究的学生年龄从9岁到12岁不等。通过研究,我们旨在加深对教师在实践中以及与理论和研究证据进行对话时如何进行评估实践的理解,特别着重于教师如何区别教学针对不同能力的学生。研究结果表明,教师对学习成绩差的学生几乎没有什么含糊的学习促进。看来这些学生最经常收到旨在增强他们自我效能的反馈,而不是信息丰富的,以学习为导向的前馈评论。一个关键问题似乎是如何帮助这些学生,使他们有能力成为自我调节的学习者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号