首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Journal of Immunology >Comparison of Immunoblotting and ELISA for Detection of Anti-Ganglioside Antibodies in Children with Guillain-Barre Syndrome
【24h】

Comparison of Immunoblotting and ELISA for Detection of Anti-Ganglioside Antibodies in Children with Guillain-Barre Syndrome

机译:免疫印迹法和ELISA法检测儿童格林-巴利综合征抗神经节苷脂抗体的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Anti-ganglioside antibody assays are widely used for diagnosis of autoimmune peripheral neuropathies. Objective: This study aimed to determine serum levels of anti-ganglioside antibodies in children with Guillain-Barre syndrome by immunoblotting technique and compare the results with those obtained by ELISA method. Method: In this investigation, 50 children with Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) who were admitted from July 2006 to July 2008, to Tabriz Children’s hospital in the northwest of Iran were studied. 30 children admitted for various other reasons than GBS were randomly selected as a control group. The levels of anti-ganglioside antibodies in serum were measured by ELISA and immunoblotting methods using commercial kits. Results: Anti-ganglioside antibodies (IgG) were detected in 16 (32%) GBS patients and in 1 (3.3%) control using ELISA assay. However, by employing immunoblotting technique, antibodies against seven gangliosides were found positive in 28 (56%) GBS patients and none in the control group. The sensitivities of immunoblotting and ELISA methods were 56% and 32% and their specificities were 100% and 97%, respectively (p0.001). Conclusion: According to the clinical criteria of GBS, the specificity and sensitivity of immunoblotting was better than those of ELISA. It is important to notice that the immunoblotting method is able to measure the seven types of antibodies (GM1, GM2, GM3, GD1a, GD1b, GT1b, and GQ1b) simultaneously and it is an easy, routine method with a lower cost.
机译:背景:抗神经节苷脂抗体测定法被广泛用于自身免疫性周围神经病的诊断。目的:本研究旨在通过免疫印迹技术测定儿童格林-巴利综合征的抗神经节苷脂抗体水平,并将其结果与ELISA法进行比较。方法:在这项调查中,研究了2006年7月至2008年7月收治于伊朗西北部大不里士儿童医院的50名吉兰-巴雷综合症(GBS)儿童。随机选择30例因GBS以外的其他原因入院的儿童作为对照组。使用商用试剂盒通过ELISA和免疫印迹法测量血清中抗神经节苷脂抗体的水平。结果:使用ELISA测定法在16名(32%)GBS患者和1名(3.3%)对照中检测到抗神经节苷脂抗体(IgG)。然而,通过免疫印迹技术,在28名(56%)GBS患者中发现了针对7种神经节苷脂的抗体阳性,而对照组中没有。免疫印迹和ELISA方法的敏感性分别为56%和32%,其特异性分别为100%和97%(p <0.001)。结论:根据GBS的临床标准,免疫印迹的特异性和敏感性均优于ELISA。重要的是要注意,免疫印迹方法能够同时测量七种类型的抗体(GM1,GM2,GM3,GD1a,GD1b,GT1b和GQ1b),这是一种简便,常规且成本较低的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号