...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of STEM Education >Exploring teacher design team endeavors while creating an elementary-focused STEM-integrated curriculum
【24h】

Exploring teacher design team endeavors while creating an elementary-focused STEM-integrated curriculum

机译:探索教师设计团队的工作,同时创建以基础为重点的STEM集成课程

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Background This study presents two teacher design teams (TDTs) during a professional development experience centered on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-integrated curriculum development. The main activity of the study, curriculum design, was framed as a design problem in order to better understand how teachers engaged with the complexities of integrated curriculum development. Additionally, Remillard’s, (Review of Educational Research 75:211–246, 2005) teacher-curriculum “participatory relationship” provided a framework for further exploring teacher actions during the design process. Utilizing a case study research design, participant curriculum design conversations were audio-recorded for 12?days during a summer professional development experience. Constructed grounded theory and a method of selective coding revealed insights about the processes and supports that enable collaborative curriculum design. Results Results showed that when a TDT is not prompted and/or enabled to first lay out and articulate the overall value of a STEM-integrated curriculum, they will rightly follow their intuitions as classroom teachers and engage in the process accordingly. Second, involving practicing teachers in the curriculum design process requires complete “participation” with the curriculum ideas they are contemplating because in the end, the curriculum’s resultant lessons will be taught in their own and other teacher’s classrooms. Conclusions The findings from this study indicate the importance of “pushing” active classroom teachers from the design to the mapping arena by instituting curriculum development activities and/or strategies (i.e., processes) that might help a TDT develop a “voice” (Remillard, From Text to 'Lived' Resources:105-122, 2011) or “value” (Dorst, Design Studies 22:4–17, 2006) for the curriculum under development. If members of a TDT are willing to reveal their interpretations, perceptions, and beliefs about the conceptual ideas embedded within the curriculum being developed, both the teachers and curriculum being developed will benefit. Finally, teachers should be made aware of their roles and responsibilities, beyond superficial descriptions; and understand participation in STEM-integrated curriculum design brings with it the likelihood their individual ideas, perceptions, and beliefs will be integrated within the curriculum being developed.
机译:摘要背景本研究在以科学,技术,工程和数学(STEM)集成的课程开发为中心的专业发展经验中,介绍了两个教师设计团队(TDT)。研究的主要活动,课程设计,被设计为一个设计问题,目的是更好地了解教师如何参与综合课程开发的复杂性。此外,雷米拉德(Remillard's,《教育研究评论》(Review of Educational Research)75:211-246,2005年)的教师课程“参与关系”为进一步探索教师在设计过程中的行为提供了框架。利用案例研究设计,在夏季的专业发展经历中,将参与者的课程设计对话录音了12天。扎实的扎根理论和选择性编码方法揭示了有关流程和支持的见解,从而使协作课程设计成为可能。结果结果表明,如果没有提示和/或使TDT能够首先展示和阐明STEM集成课程的整体价值,那么他们将正确地遵循课堂老师的直觉并相应地参与该过程。其次,让实践中的教师参与课程设计过程需要完全“参与”他们正在考虑的课程构想,因为最后,该课程的最终课程将在他们自己的和其他老师的教室中教授。结论结论:这项研究的结果表明,通过制定可能有助于TDT形成“声音”的课程开发活动和/或策略(即过程),将活跃的课堂教师从设计“推向”绘图领域的重要性(Remillard,对于正在开发的课程,从“文本”到“活的”资源:105-122,2011年)或“价值”(Dorst,设计研究22:4–17,2006)。如果TDT的成员愿意透露他们对正在开发的课程中所包含的概念性想法的理解,看法和信念,那么正在开发的教师和课程都将受益。最后,除了肤浅的描述外,还应使教师意识到他们的角色和职责;并且了解参与STEM集成课程设计带来的可能性是,他们的个人思想,观念和信念将被整合到正在开发的课程中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号