...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Food Studies >National Food Safety Systems in the European Union: A Comparative Survey
【24h】

National Food Safety Systems in the European Union: A Comparative Survey

机译:欧盟国家食品安全体系:比较调查

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper is a comparative survey of the National Food Safety Systems (NFSS) of the European Union (EU) Member-States (MS) and the Central EU level. The main organizational structures of the NFSS, their legal frameworks, their responsibilities, their experiences, and challenges relating to food safety are discussed. Growing concerns about food safety have led the EU itself, its MS and non-EU countries, which are EU trade-partners, to review and modify their food safety systems. Our study suggests that the EU and 22 out of 27 Member States (MS) have reorganized their NFSS by establishing a single food safety authority or a similar organization on the national or central level. In addition, the study analyzes different approaches towards the establishment of such agencies. Areas where marked differences in approaches were seen included the division of responsibilities for risk assessment (RA), risk management (RM), and risk communication (RC). We found that in 12 Member States, all three areas of activity (RA, RM, and RC) are kept together, whereas in 10 Member States, risk management is functionally or institutionally separate from risk assessment and risk communication. No single ideal model for others to follow for the organization of a food safety authority was observed; however, revised NFSS, either in EU member states or at the EU central level, may be more effective from the previous arrangements, because they provide central supervision, give priority to food control programs, and maintain comprehensive risk analysis as part of their activities.
机译:本文是对欧盟(EU)成员国(MS)和欧盟中部国家的国家食品安全系统(NFSS)的比较调查。讨论了NFSS的主要组织结构,其法律框架,职责,经验以及与食品安全有关的挑战。对食品安全的日益关注已导致欧盟本身,其成员国和非欧盟国家(它们是欧盟的贸易伙伴)审查和修改其食品安全体系。我们的研究表明,欧盟和27个成员国(MS)中的22个已经通过在国家或中央一级建立单一的食品安全机构或类似组织来重组其NFSS。此外,研究分析了建立此类机构的不同方法。在方法上存在明显差异的领域包括风险评估(RA),风险管理(RM)和风险沟通(RC)的职责划分。我们发现,在12个会员国中,所有三个活动领域(RA,RM和RC)保持在一起,而在10个会员国中,风险管理在功能或机构上与风险评估和风险沟通分开。没有观察到任何其他人可以遵循的理想模式来组织食品安全当局;但是,无论是在欧盟成员国还是在欧盟中央一级,修订后的NFSS可能都比以前的安排更为有效,因为它们提供了中央监督,将食品控制计划放在优先位置,并在其活动中保持全面的风险分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号