首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Analysis of the National Adult Nutrition Survey (Ireland) and the Food4Me Nutrition Survey Databases to Explore the Development of Food Labelling Portion Sizes for the European Union
【2h】

Analysis of the National Adult Nutrition Survey (Ireland) and the Food4Me Nutrition Survey Databases to Explore the Development of Food Labelling Portion Sizes for the European Union

机译:分析国家成人营养调查(爱尔兰)和Food4Me营养调查数据库以探索欧盟食品标签部分尺寸的发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study set out to explore the option of developing food portion size for nutritional labelling purposes using two European Union (EU) dietary surveys. The surveys were selected as they differed in (a) methodologies (food diary versus food frequency questionnaire), (b) populations (Irish National Adult Nutrition Survey (NANS) versus a seven-country survey based on the pan EU study Food4Me), (c) food quantification (multiple options versus solely photographic album) and (d) duration (4 consecutive days versus recent month). Using data from these studies, portion size was determined for 15 test foods, where portion size was defined as the median intake of a target food when consumed. The median values of the portion sizes derived from both the NANS and Food4Me surveys were correlated (r = 0.823; p < 0.00) and the mean of the two survey data sets were compared to US values from the Recognized as Customarily Consumed (RACC) database. There was very strong agreement across all food categories between the averaged EU and the US portion size (r = 0.947; p < 0.00). It is concluded that notwithstanding the variety of approaches used for dietary survey data in the EU, the present data supports using a standardized approach to food portion size quantification for food labelling in the EU.
机译:本研究着手探讨使用两次欧盟(EU)饮食调查为营养标签目的开发食品份量的选择。选择这些调查是因为它们在(a)方法(食物日记与食物频率调查表),(b)人群(爱尔兰国家成人营养调查(NANS)与基于泛欧研究Food4Me的七个国家的调查)中有所不同, c)食物定量(多种选择而不是单独照相)和(d)持续时间(连续4天对比最近一个月)。使用这些研究的数据,确定了15种测试食品的份量,其中份量定义为目标食品进食时的中位数摄入量。来自NANS和Food4Me调查的份量中位数相互关联(r = 0.823; p <0.00),并将两个调查数据集的平均值与“公认消费习惯”(RACC)数据库中的美国值进行比较。在所有食品类别中,欧盟和美国的平均份量之间存在非常强烈的共识(r = 0.947; p <0.00)。结论是,尽管欧盟用于膳食调查数据的方法多种多样,但本数据支持使用标准化方法对欧盟食品标签中的食物份量进行量化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号