首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of surgical oncology >Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Oncoplasty Breast Surgery in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer and Comparison with Conventional Breast Conservation Surgery
【24h】

Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Oncoplasty Breast Surgery in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer and Comparison with Conventional Breast Conservation Surgery

机译:局部晚期乳腺癌的肿瘤成形术的手术效果评价及与常规保乳手术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare early oncologic outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery and conventional breast conservation surgery in patients of locally advanced breast cancer. A single-center, prospective, non-randomized study enrolled select cases of locally advanced breast cancer (TNM T3/T4, N0/1/2) who after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were considered for breast conservation surgery with oncoplasty techniques. The specimen volume resected, the mean margins and mean closest margin obtained were noted. The re-surgery rates, complication rates, and incidence of locoregional recurrence were also noted. Variables were compared with a retrospective cohort of similar patients who had undergone conventional breast conservation surgery. Fifty-seven patients underwent OBS (group 1) and were compared with 43 cases that had undergone conventional BCS (group 2). Majority of the patients in group 1 (73 %) had cT3 with N0 or N+ and a minority (17 %) were with limited skin involvement (cT4 and N0/N+). Relatively larger sized, post-NACT tumors could undergo OBS(4.4 vs 2.3 cm). Relatively greater proportion of tumors in central and lower quadrants were addressed by oncoplasty than traditional BCS (17/57, 29 % vs 4/43, 9 %, p = 0.04). The mean specimen volume excised in group 1 was more than that in group 2. (187.54 vs 125.19; p = 0.01). The mean of the margins were obtained more in group 1 (1.04 vs 0.69 cm); p p p = 0.34 NS). The median follow-up period of group 1 is 18 months (range 06–30 months) while group 2 is 34 months (14–44 months. There was no recurrence in group 1, but there were 5 cases (11 %) in group 2. Oncoplasty breast surgery offers more opportunity for breast conservation and oncologic safety than conventional breast conserving surgery.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较局部晚期乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形外科手术和常规乳腺保留外科手术的早期肿瘤学结果。一项单中心,前瞻性,非随机性研究纳入了部分局部晚期乳腺癌(TNM T3 / T4,N0 / 1/2)的患者,这些患者在新辅助化疗后被考虑通过肿瘤成形术进行乳房保留手术。切除标本体积,记录获得的平均边缘和平均最近边缘。还指出了再手术率,并发症发生率和局部复发率。将变量与接受常规保乳手术的类似患者的回顾性队列进行比较。 57例患者接受了OBS(组1),并与43例接受常规BCS的患者(组2)进行了比较。第一组的大多数患者(73%)的cT3为N0或N +,少数患者(17%)的皮肤受累程度有限(cT4和N0 / N +)。 NACT后相对较大的肿瘤可能会发生OBS(4.4 vs 2.3 cm)。与传统的BCS相比,通过肿瘤成形术可解决中下象限中相对较大比例的肿瘤(17 / 57,29%vs 4 / 43,9%,p = 0.04)。第1组的平均标本体积大于第2组的平均值(187.54 vs 125.19; p = 0.01)。第一组中获得的切缘平均值更高(1.04对0.69 cm); p p p = 0.34 NS)。第一组的中位随访期为18个月(06-30个月),而第二组的中位随访期为34个月(14-44个月)。第1组无复发,但第5例(11%) 2.整形乳房手术比常规的乳房保留手术为乳房保留和肿瘤安全提供了更多机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号