首页> 外文期刊>Medical Journal Armed Forces India >Evaluation of surgical outcomes following oncoplastic breast surgery in early breast cancer and comparison with conventional breast conservation surgery
【24h】

Evaluation of surgical outcomes following oncoplastic breast surgery in early breast cancer and comparison with conventional breast conservation surgery

机译:早期乳腺癌骨乳房手术后的手术结果评估,与常规乳房保护手术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) ensures better tumour resection than conventional breast conservation surgery (BCS). Methods: A prospective comparative study, conducted over a 3-year period, enrolled patients with early breast cancer who underwent OBS. The total volume of glandular resection, tumour volume resection and width of the margins obtained were noted. The incidence of complications, requirement of revision surgery and locoregional recurrence during follow-up period were also noted. The data were compared with matched controls who had undergone convention BCS in the past.Results: Thirty-three patients underwent oncoplastic surgery and the data was compared with 46 patients of conventional breast conservation. The mean volume of specimen was higher in the oncoplastic group (173.5 cm3 vs 101.4 cm3, p = 0.03) though the tumour volume excised was similar (43.2 cm3 vs 36.4 cm3, p = 0.14). The mean margin widths were larger in the oncoplastic group (14 mm vs 6 mm, p = 0.01). There were more instances of close and positive margins seen in conventional BCS groups. The incidence of complication rate was similar. Median follow-up 18 months for oncoplasty group showed no cases of locoregional recurrence while in median follow-up of 38 months for conventional BCS group, six cases of locoregional relapse were noted.Conclusions: Oncoplastic surgery results in excision of larger volume of breast tissue and correspondingly obtain wider surgical margins as compared to conventional BCS. Longer follow-up is required to determine if wider resection translates into better locoregional control.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是确定砧乳房手术(OBS)是否可确保比常规乳房保护手术(BCS)更好的肿瘤切除。方法:在3年期间进行的前瞻性比较研究,注册了接受过OBS的早期乳腺癌患者。注意到腺体切除的总体积,肿瘤体积切除和获得的余量的宽度。还注意到并发症的发病率,调节手术要求和随访期间的课程复发。将数据与过去经历过公约的匹配控制进行了比较。结果:33名患者接受了砧型手术,数据与46例常规乳房保护患者进行了比较。扁平塑料基团的平均体积较高(173.5cm 3,101.4cm 3,p = 0.03),尽管切除肿瘤体积相似(43.2cm 3 vs 36.4cm 3,p = 0.14)。在砧料组中平均边缘宽度较大(14mm Vs 6mm,P = 0.01)。在传统的BCS组中看到了更多的近距离和正缘的情况。并发症率的发生率为相似。 oncoplasty集团的中位随访18个月出现了常规BCS组中位于38个月的中位随访的情况下,注意到了左右的招待复发。结论:猫造身手术导致切除较大体积的乳房组织与传统BCS相比,相应地获得更宽的手术边距。需要更长的随访,以确定更宽的切除是否转化为更好的招生控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号