【24h】

Arguing for PhD Coursework

机译:攻读博士学位课程

获取原文
           

摘要

The lone-scholar reputation of the traditional UK style PhD program is the result or a misunderstanding by some course designers. Getting a PhD is as much about making friends, forming a collegiate group, as it is about writing a book. The loneliness should be about being an independent thinker, not to being physically lonely. An increasing number of researchers are now reasserting Aristotle's calls for informed public argument to advance inquiry. Research is an argumentative process, requiring claims and a universal audience of independent thinkers to constructively question those claims. This paper argues for the establishment of semi-structured programs for PhD students, but importantly, one that undergrirds any program with an appreciation that research is an argumentative process, trying to develop knowledgeable audiences, and thus a social activity.
机译:传统的英国式博士学位课程的独特声誉是某些课程设计者的结果或误解。获得博士学位与写书一样,与结交朋友,形成大学团队同样重要。孤独应该是关于成为一个独立的思想家,而不是在身体上孤独。现在,越来越多的研究人员对亚里斯多德的呼吁进行了重申,要求他们进行有根据的公开论点以推进研究。研究是一个争论的过程,需要主张和独立思想家的广泛关注来建设性地质疑这些主张。本文主张为博士生建立半结构化的课程,但重要的是,该课程会使任何课程陷入困境,并意识到研究是一个争论的过程,试图发展知识渊博的受众,从而发展一种社交活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号