首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Preferences of the medical faculty members for electronic faculty development programs (e-FDP): a qualitative study
【24h】

Preferences of the medical faculty members for electronic faculty development programs (e-FDP): a qualitative study

机译:医学系成员对电子系培养计划(e-FDP)的偏爱:定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Medical faculties are responsible for the training and development of future physicians. Therefore, they must learn the teaching methods. Considering their extensive roles, adult learning theory, and technological developments, the best solution is e-learning. This study extracted the views and preferences of clinical faculties about the electronic faculty development programs. Methods: Clinical faculty members and medical education and e-learning specialists from medical universities in Iran participated in this qualitative content analysis study during 2017–2018. Data were collected with purposive sampling method by 18 semi-structured interviews and 2 focus groups with 11 participants. The data were analyzed using the conventional qualitative content analysis method. Validity and accuracy of data were provided on the basis of Guba and Lincoln criteria. Results: Five categories including “Technology infrastructure” (Presentation, Platform, E-Learning environment), “learner” (Features, Motivation), ”Program management” (Blending, Interaction), “content” (Design, Application, Organization), and “evaluation” (Learner assessment, Program evaluation) were extracted. Conclusion: Faculty members prefer to attend e-learning courses that focus on individualization, blended learning, and mobile learning. The best solution is to use the microlearning approach, that is, short pieces of content focusing on a learning goal that can be presented by all electronic devices in the form of any kind of media, and is in fact the learning fingerfood.
机译:简介:医学系负责未来医师的培训和发展。因此,他们必须学习教学方法。考虑到它们的广泛作用,成人学习理论和技术发展,最好的解决方案是电子学习。这项研究提取了有关电子教职员工发展计划的临床教职员工的观点和偏好。方法:伊朗医科大学的临床教职人员以及医学教育和电子学习专家参加了2017-2018年间的定性内容分析研究。通过18个半结构化访谈和11名参与者组成的2个焦点小组,采用有针对性的抽样方法收集了数据。使用常规的定性内容分析方法分析数据。数据的有效性和准确性是根据Guba和Lincoln标准提供的。结果:五个类别包括“技术基础设施”(演示,平台,电子学习环境),“学习者”(功能,动机),“程序管理”(融合,交互),“内容”(设计,应用,组织),提取“评估”(学习者评估,计划评估)。结论:教师更喜欢参加针对个性化,混合学习和移动学习的电子学习课程。最好的解决方案是使用微学习方法,即专注于学习目标的简短内容,所有电子设备都可以以任何一种媒体的形式呈现这些内容,实际上这是学习的手笔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号