首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Medicine >Survival and clinical prognostic factors in metastatic non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy: A multi‐institutional, retrospective study using the Korean metastatic renal cell carcinoma registry
【24h】

Survival and clinical prognostic factors in metastatic non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy: A multi‐institutional, retrospective study using the Korean metastatic renal cell carcinoma registry

机译:靶向治疗治疗的转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌的生存和临床预后因素:使用韩国转移性肾细胞癌登记系统的多机构回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives The optimal treatment strategy for metastatic non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mNCCRCC) is still elusive and mainly extrapolated from evidence available for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The aim of the study was therefore to investigate the survival outcomes and prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with mNCCRCC treated with targeted therapy. Materials and methods We analyzed a total of 156 patients (8.1%) with mNCCRCC among the total cohort of 1922 patients in the Korean metastatic RCC registry. We used Kaplan‐Meier curve analysis to calculate the survival estimates for first‐line progression‐free survival (PFS), total PFS, and cancer‐specific survival (CSS). We also used the log‐rank test to compare the different groups and multivariate Cox‐proportional hazard regression analyses to evaluate the prognostic factors for survival. Results The mNCCRCC group had significantly inferior survival outcomes in terms of first‐line PFS, total PFS, and CSS (all P ??0.05). We found survival benefits in patients treated with first‐line vascular endothelial growth factor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF‐TKIs, first‐line PFS, and total PFS, all P ??0.05), cytoreductive nephrectomy (CSS, P ??0.0001), metastasectomy (CSS, P ?=?0.0017), and patients with metachronous metastasis (first‐line PFS, total PFS, and CSS, all P ??0.05). Liver metastasis was the only significant prognostic factor for both first‐line PFS and CSS (all P ??0.05). Conclusions In the current targeted therapy era, survival of mNCCRCC is still inferior in comparison with that of mCCRCC patients. We found survival benefits in patients treated with first‐line VEGF‐TKIs/CN/metastasectomy, and metachronous metastasis patients.
机译:目的转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌(mNCCRCC)的最佳治疗策略仍难以捉摸,主要是从转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌的可用证据中推论得出。因此,该研究的目的是调查接受靶向治疗的mNCCRCC患者的生存结局和影响生存的预后因素。材料和方法在韩国转移性RCC登记的1922名患者中,我们分析了156名mNCCRCC患者(8.1%)。我们使用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析来计算一线无进展生存期(PFS),总PFS和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)的生存期估计值。我们还使用了对数秩检验来比较不同的组,并使用多因素Cox比例风险回归分析来评估生存率的预后因素。结果就一线PFS,总PFS和CSS而言,mNCCRCC组的生存结局均较差(所有P <0.05)。我们发现在接受一线血管内皮生长因子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGF-TKIs,一线PFS和总PFS,所有P均<0.05),细胞减灭性肾切除术(CSS,P ? 0.0001),转移灶切除术(CSS,P = 0.0017)和有转移的患者(一线PFS,总PFS和CSS,所有P <0.05)。肝转移是一线PFS和CSS的唯一重要预后因素(所有P≤0.05)。结论在目前的靶向治疗时代,与mCCRCC患者相比,mNCCRCC的生存率仍然较低。我们发现在一线VEGF-TKIs / CN /转移灶治疗的患者以及异时转移患者的生存获益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号