首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Jassy, Constructions, Architechture Section >Comparative Study Related to Failure Force and Failure Mechanism Between Real Life Test and 3-D FEM Model on a Highway Beam
【24h】

Comparative Study Related to Failure Force and Failure Mechanism Between Real Life Test and 3-D FEM Model on a Highway Beam

机译:真实测试与公路横梁3-D FEM模型中与破坏力和破坏机理相关的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This document aims to presents the comparison in terms of failure force and failure mechanism between a real life experiment conducted in 2008 on a highway prestressed and precasted box beam subjected to concentrated loads and loaded until failure in 6 load cicles and a 3-D finite element model prestressed, loaded and constrained in the exact same manner. The reason for a 3-D finite element model was to a better observing of the behavior of stress, strain and crack distribution in the beam and to calibrate the model in order to make a parametric study in the future, varying different aspects: load application, section thickness, prestress, etc. The results of this study may provide important informations, considering that our country has a huge potential for implementation of prestressed box girders due to the urgent need to achieve a modern and adequate transport infrastructure. The validity of the proposed model is demonstrated as follows by comparison with experimental results obtained by INCERC. This paper deals with the largest destructive test, ever performed in Romania on a prefabricated bridge box girder.
机译:本文旨在就破坏力和破坏机理进行比较,该实验是在2008年对承受预应力和预制荷载的公路预应力和预制箱形梁进行集中荷载并荷载直至6个荷载层柱破坏和3D有限元之间的真实实验之间的比较。以完全相同的方式对模型进行预应力,载荷和约束。使用3-D有限元模型的原因是为了更好地观察梁中的应力,应变和裂缝分布的行为,并对模型进行校准,以便将来在不同方面进行参数研究:载荷应用,截面厚度,预应力等。考虑到由于迫切需要实现现代而适当的交通基础设施,我国具有实施预应力箱梁的巨大潜力,该研究的结果可能会提供重要的信息。通过与INCERC获得的实验结果进行比较,证明了所提出模型的有效性。本文讨论了罗马尼亚有史以来对预制桥箱梁进行的最大破坏性试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号