...
首页> 外文期刊>BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neurosciences >The Effect of Recast vs. Self Correction on Writing Accuracy: The Role of Awareness
【24h】

The Effect of Recast vs. Self Correction on Writing Accuracy: The Role of Awareness

机译:重铸与自我校正对写作准确性的影响:意识的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies in support of the facilitative role of correction in either forms of recast, repetition, confirmations, compression checks, or clarification request abound (Ellis, 2003). Among these studies recast has proved to be the most frequent type of error correction in classroom [30] [32]; however,?? self-correction or elicitation might make students notice the gap more than recast. To illuminate the difference, two methods of recast and self correction were applied to two groups of students to see if there would be any difference between two methods on the students' writing accuracy regarding the use of past tense. Man Whitney, along with Wilcoxon, was run as the main statistical techniques to examine the effectiveness of methods of error correction on students' writing accuracy. The result of this study showed that there is no significant difference between the two methods of correction although students improve after treatment; however, self correction outperformed recast and recast did not improve students' accuracy in posttest.
机译:支持改正在重铸,重复,确认,压缩检查或澄清请求中的任何形式的促进作用的研究不胜枚举(Ellis,2003年)。在这些研究中,重铸已被证明是教室中最常见的错误纠正类型[30] [32];然而,??自我纠正或启发可能会使学生注意到差距而不是重铸。为了说明这种差异,将重铸和自我更正这两种方法应用于两组学生,以查看两种方法在使用过去式时对学生写作准确性的影响是否存在差异。曼·惠特尼(Man Whitney)和威尔科克森(Wilcoxon)被用作主要的统计技术,以检验纠错方法对学生写作准确性的有效性。这项研究的结果表明,尽管学生在治疗后有所改善,但两种矫正方法之间没有显着差异。但是,自我纠正的表现优于重铸和重铸并不能提高学生的后测准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号