首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Reflection revisited: how physicians conceptualize and experience reflection in professional practice – a qualitative study
【24h】

Reflection revisited: how physicians conceptualize and experience reflection in professional practice – a qualitative study

机译:反思反思:医生如何在专业实践中概念化和体验反思-定性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

For the purpose of continuous performance improvement, physicians are expected to reflect on their practice. While many reflection studies are theoretically oriented and often prescriptive in the sense that they conceptualize what reflection should look like, the current study starts with practicing physicians themselves and maps how these physicians conceptualize and experience reflection in daily professional practice. We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 13 hospital-based physicians from various specialties and institutions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and were analyzed iteratively, following the interpretative phenomenological analysis approach. Data analysis resulted in the identification of three main topics: fuzziness, domain specificity and dialogical dynamics of reflection in professional practice. Reflection was conceptualized as a fuzzy process of contemplation and action, leading to change and hopefully improvement of personal performance and health care in general. Physicians’ experiences with reflection were different for the patient domain and the team domain. Whereas experiences in the patient domain were recalled first and discussed in relatively clear terms, those in the team domain came second and were discussed in more ambiguous terms. In order to achieve improvement in daily practice, honest and open dialogues were perceived as necessary. These dialogues were regarded as the result of an interplay between an internal and an external dialogue. The internal dialogue required sensitivity and courage of the individual; the external dialogue required psychological safety and encouragement of the environment. Within the team domain however, handling the external dialogue effectively was not self-evident, underlining the importance of psychological safety. This study draws attention to the interdependence between the individual and the collective contributions to reflective activity in professional practice. Apart from its importance to physicians’ individual medical performance, reflective activity is also important to the functioning of a team of physicians. To allow reflection to rise from an individual activity to a team activity, it is necessary to invest in a safe environment in which people are encouraged to think, act, and be engaged.
机译:为了持续改善性能,医生应反思自己的做法。虽然许多反思研究在理论上是导向性的,并且通常是规定性的,因为它们将反思应该看起来像什么,但当前的研究始于执业医师本人,并绘制了这些医师如何在日常的专业实践中概念化和体验反思。我们通过对来自各个专业和机构的13位住院医生的深入访谈进行了定性研究。按照解释性现象学分析方法,对访谈进行逐字记录并进行迭代分析。数据分析确定了三个主要主题:专业实践中的模糊性,领域特异性和对话动态。反思被概念化为沉思和行动的模糊过程,从而导致改变并有望总体上改善个人绩效和医疗保健。在患者领域和团队领域,医师的反思经验有所不同。首先回顾患者领域的经验并以相对清晰的术语进行讨论,而团队领域的经验则第二,并以更加模糊的术语进行讨论。为了改善日常操作,诚实和公开的对话被认为是必要的。这些对话被认为是内部对话与外部对话相互作用的结果。内部对话需要个人的敏锐度和勇气;外部对话需要心理安全并鼓励环境。然而,在团队范围内,有效地处理外部对话并不是不言而喻的,这突显了心理安全的重要性。这项研究提请注意个人和集体对专业实践中反思活动的贡献之间的相互依赖性。除了对医师个人医疗绩效的重要性外,反思活动对医师团队的运作也很重要。为了使反思从个人活动变为团队活动,有必要在一个鼓励人们思考,行动和参与的安全环境中进行投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号