首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >‘It just has to click’: Internists’ views of: what constitutes productive interactions with chronically ill patients
【24h】

‘It just has to click’: Internists’ views of: what constitutes productive interactions with chronically ill patients

机译:“只需点击即可”:实习医生的观点:什么与慢性病患者产生富有成效的互动

获取原文
           

摘要

Background According to the Chronic Care Model, productive interactions are crucial to patient outcomes. Despite productive interactions being at the heart of the Model, however, it is unclear what constitutes such an interaction. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of physician views of productive interactions with the chronically ill. Method We conducted a qualitative study and interviewed 20 internists working in an academic hospital. The data were analyzed using a constructivist approach of grounded theory. To categorize the data, a coding process within which a code list was developed and tested with two other coders was conducted. Results The participants engaged in goal-directed reasoning when reflecting on productive interactions. This resulted in the identification of four goal orientations: (a) health outcome; (b) satisfaction; (c) medical process; and (d) collaboration. Collaboration appeared to be conditional for reaching medical process goals and ultimately health outcome and satisfaction goals. Achieving rapport with the patient (‘clicking,’ in the term of the participants) was found to be a key condition that catalyzed collaboration goals. Clicking appeared to be seen as a somewhat unpredictable phenomenon that might or might not emerge, which one had to accept and work with. Goal orientations were found to be related to the specific medical context (i.e., a participant’s subspecialty and the nature of a patient’s complaint). Conclusions The participants viewed a productive interaction as essentially goal-directed, catalyzed by the two parties clicking, and dependent on the nature of a patient’s complaint. Using the findings, we developed a conceptual process model with the four goal orientations as wheels and with clicking in the center as a flywheel. Because clicking was viewed as important, but somewhat unpredictable, teaching physicians how to click, while taking account of the medical context, may warrant greater attention.
机译:背景根据慢性护理模型,生产性相互作用对于患者的预后至关重要。尽管生产性交互是该模型的核心,但尚不清楚什么构成这种交互。这项研究的目的是为了更好地了解医师对慢性病患者生产性相互作用的看法。方法我们进行了定性研究,并采访了在学术医院工作的20名内科医师。使用扎根理论的建构主义方法对数据进行了分析。为了对数据进行分类,进行了一个编码过程,在该过程中开发了一个代码列表,并与另外两个编码器一起进行了测试。结果参与者在反思生产性互动时会进行目标导向的推理。这样就确定了四个目标方向:(a)健康结果; (b)满意; (c)医疗程序; (d)合作。合作似乎是达到医疗过程目标以及最终实现健康结果和满意度目标的条件。与患者保持融洽(在参与者的术语中为“点击”)被认为是促进合作目标的关键条件。单击似乎被视为一种可能会或可能不会出现的不可预测的现象,必须接受并使用。发现目标定位与特定的医疗环境有关(即,参与者的专长和患者投诉的性质)。结论参与者认为生产性互动本质上是目标导向的,是由两方的点击催化的,并且取决于患者投诉的性质。利用这些发现,我们开发了一个概念性的过程模型,以四个目标方向为轮子,而单击中心为飞轮。由于单击被认为是重要的,但在某种程度上是不可预测的,因此,在考虑医学背景的同时,教医生如何单击可能会引起更多关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号