首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Pharmacological regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: an overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis
【24h】

Pharmacological regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: an overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis

机译:根除幽门螺杆菌的药理学方案:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的概述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Approximately half of the world’s population is infected with Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), a bacterium shown to be linked with a series of gastrointestinal diseases. A growing number of systematic reviews (SRs) have been published comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for H.pylori infection but have not reached a consistent conclusion. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of SRs of pharmacological therapies for the eradication of H.pylori. Methods Major electronic databases were searched to identify relevant SRs published between 2002 and February 2016. Studies were considered eligible if they included RCTs comparing different pharmacological regimens for treating patients diagnosed as H.pylori infected and pooled the eradication rates in a meta-analysis. A modified version of the ‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews’ (AMSTAR) was used to assess the methodological quality. A Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the different proton pump inhibitors (PPI) within triple therapy. Results 30 SRs with pairwise meta-analysis were included. In triple therapy, the NMA ranked the esomeprazole to be the most effective PPI, followed by rabeprazole, while no difference was observed among the three old generations of PPI for the eradication of H.pylori. When comparing triple and bismuth-based therapy, the relative effectiveness appeared to be dependent on the choice of antibiotics within the triple therapy; moxifloxacin or levofloxacin-based triple therapy were both associated with greater effectiveness than bismuth-based therapy as a second-line treatment, while bismuth-based therapy achieved similar or greater eradication rate compared to clarithromycin-based therapy. Inconsistent findings were reported regarding the use of levofloxacin/moxifloxacin in the first-line treatment; this could be due to the varied resistant rate to different antibiotics across regions and populations. Critical appraisal showed a low-moderate level of overall methodological quality of included studies. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that the new generation of PPIs and use of moxifloxacin or levofloxacin within triple therapy as second-line treatment were associated with greater effectiveness. Given the varied antibiotic resistant rate across regions, the appropriateness of pooling results together in meta-analysis should be carefully considered and the recommendation of the choice of antibiotics should be localized.
机译:背景技术全世界大约一半的人口感染了幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori),该细菌被证明与一系列胃肠道疾病有关。越来越多的系统评价(SR)已发表,比较了不同治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的效果,但尚未得出一致的结论。这项研究的目的是概述根除幽门螺杆菌的药理学治疗方法。方法检索主要电子数据库以鉴定2002年至2016年2月之间发表的相关SR。如果研究包括比较不同药理学方案治疗被诊断为幽门螺杆菌感染的患者的RCT,并纳入荟萃分析,则认为该研究合格。修改后的“评估系统评价的评估工具”(AMSTAR)用于评估方法学质量。进行了贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析(NMA),以比较三联疗法中不同的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。结果纳入了30对具有成对荟萃分析的SR。在三联疗法中,NMA将埃索美拉唑列为最有效的PPI,其次是雷贝拉唑,而在三代PPI的根除幽门螺杆菌中均未见差异。当比较基于三联疗法和基于铋的疗法时,相对效果似乎取决于三联疗法中抗生素的选择。与基于铋的疗法作为二线治疗相比,莫西沙星或左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法均具有更高的疗效,而与克拉霉素为基础的疗法相比,基于铋的疗法获得了相似或更高的根除率。关于在一线治疗中使用左氧氟沙星/莫西沙星的报道不一致。这可能是由于不同地区和人群对不同抗生素的耐药率不同。严格评估显示纳入研究的总体方法学质量处于中等水平。结论我们的分析表明,新一代PPI以及三联疗法作为二线治疗使用莫西沙星或左氧氟沙星具有更大的疗效。鉴于各个地区的抗生素耐药率各不相同,应仔细考虑合并分析在荟萃分析中的适当性,并应本地化选择抗生素的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号