首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Cognitive function and the agreement between self-reported and accelerometer-accessed physical activity
【24h】

Cognitive function and the agreement between self-reported and accelerometer-accessed physical activity

机译:认知功能以及自我报告和加速度计访问的身体活动之间的一致性

获取原文
           

摘要

Numerous studies have reported weak or moderate correlations between self-reported and accelerometer-assessed physical activity. One explanation is that self-reported physical activity might be biased by demographic, cognitive or other factors. Cognitive function is one factor that could be associated with either overreporting or underreporting of daily physical activity. Difficulties in remembering past physical activities might result in recall bias. Thus, the current study examines whether the cognitive function is associated with differences between self-reported and accelerometer-assessed physical activity. Cross-sectional data from the population-based Activity and Function in the Elderly in Ulm study (ActiFE) were used. A total of 1172 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65–90?years) wore a uniaxial accelerometer (activPAL unit) for a week. Additionally, self-reported physical activity was assessed using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ). Cognitive function was measured with four items (immediate memory, delayed memory, recognition memory, and semantic fluency) from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Total Score (CERAD-TS). Mean differences of self-reported and accelerometer-assessed physical activity (MPA) were associated with cognitive function in men (rs?=??.12, p?=?.002) but not in women. Sex-stratified multiple linear regression analyses showed that MPA declined with high cognitive function in men (β?=??.13; p?=?.015). Results suggest that self-reported physical activity should be interpreted with caution in older populations, as cognitive function was one factor that explained the differences between objective and subjective physical activity measurements.
机译:大量研究报告了自我报告的运动量与加速度计评估的身体活动之间的相关性较弱或中等。一种解释是,自我报告的体育活动可能会受到人口统计,认知或其他因素的影响。认知功能是可能与日常体育活动的过高或过低相关的一个因素。回忆过去的体育活动的困难可能会导致回忆偏见。因此,当前的研究检验了认知功能是否与自我报告的和加速度计评估的身体活动之间的差异有关。使用来自乌尔姆地区老年人群活动和功能的横断面研究数据(ActiFE)。总共有1172名居住在社区中的老年人(年龄在65-90岁之间)戴着单轴加速度计(activPAL单位)一周。此外,使用LASA身体活动问卷(LAPAQ)评估了自我报告的身体活动。认知功能通过联盟的四个项目(即时记忆,延迟记忆,识别记忆和语义流利度)进行测量,以建立阿尔茨海默氏病总评分(CERAD-TS)注册表。自我报告和加速度计评估的体育活动(MPA)的平均差异与男性的认知功能有关(rs?=?0.12,p?= ?. 002),但与女性无关。性别分层多元线性回归分析显示,男性的MPA下降并具有较高的认知功能(β?=?0.13; p?= ?. 015)。结果表明,在老年人口中应谨慎解释自我报告的体育活动,因为认知功能是解释客观和主观体育活动测量之间差异的因素之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号