首页> 外文期刊>BMC Obesity >Correlation of adiposity indices with cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy adults of Singapore: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Correlation of adiposity indices with cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy adults of Singapore: a cross-sectional study

机译:新加坡健康成年人的肥胖指数与心血管疾病危险因素的相关性:一项横断面研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundObesity has long been highlighted for its association with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nonetheless, the best adiposity indices to evaluate the CVD risk factors remain contentious and few studies have been performed in Asian populations. In the present study, we compared the association strength of percent body fat (PBF) to indirect anthropometric measures of general adiposity (body mass index (BMI) and body adiposity index (BAI)) and central adiposity (waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)) for the prediction of CVD risk factors in healthy men and women living in Singapore. MethodsA total of 125 individuals (63 men and 62 women) took part in this study. PBF was measured by using three different techniques, including bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), BOD POD, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Anthropometric measurements (WC, hip circumference (HC), height, and weight), fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting serum insulin (FSI), and lipid profiles were determined according to standard protocols. Correlations of anthropometric measurements and PBF with CVD risk factors were compared. ResultsIrrespective of the measuring techniques, PBF showed strong positive correlations with FSI, HOMA-IR, TC/HDL, TG/HDL, and LDL/HDL in both genders. While PBF was highly correlated with FBG, SBP, and DBP in females, no significant relationships were observed in males. Amongst the five anthropometric measures of adiposity, BAI was the best predictor for CVD risk factors in female participants ( r =?0.593 for HOMA-IR, r =?0.542 for TG/HDL, r =?0.474 for SBP, and r =?0.448 for DBP). For males, the combination of WC ( r =?0.629 for HOMA-IR, and r =?0.446 for TG/HDL) and WHR ( r =?0.352 for SBP, and r =?0.366 for DBP) had the best correlation with CVD risk factors. ConclusionMeasurement of PBF does not outperform the simple anthropometric measurements of obesity, i.e. BAI, WC, and WHR, in the prediction of CVD risk factors in healthy Asian adults. While measures of central adiposity (WC and WHR) tend to show stronger associations with CVD risk factors in males, measures of general adiposity (BAI) seems to be the best predictor in females. The gender differences in the association between adiposity indices and CVD risk factors may relate to different body fat distribution in males and females living in Singapore. These results may find further clinical utility to identify patients with CVD risk factors in a more efficient way.
机译:背景长期以来,肥胖症因其与心血管疾病(CVD)发病率增加相关而备受关注。尽管如此,评估CVD危险因素的最佳肥胖指数仍然存在争议,在亚洲人群中进行的研究很少。在本研究中,我们比较了体脂百分比(PBF)与间接肥胖​​人体测量指标(一般体重指数(BMI)和身体肥胖指数(BAI))和中央肥胖(腰围(WC))的关联强度,以及腰臀比(WHR)用于预测新加坡健康男性和女性的CVD危险因素。方法共有125名个体(63名男性和62名女性)参加了这项研究。通过使用三种不同的技术来测量PBF,包括生物电阻抗分析(BIA),BOD POD和双能X射线吸收法(DEXA)。根据标准方案确定人体测量值(WC,臀围(HC),身高和体重),空腹血糖(FBG),空腹血清胰岛素(FSI)和脂质分布。比较了人体测量结果和PBF与CVD危险因素的相关性。结果无论使用哪种测量技术,男女均PBF与FSI,HOMA-IR,TC / HDL,TG / HDL和LDL / HDL呈强正相关。虽然女性中PBF与FBG,SBP和DBP高度相关,但在男性中未发现显着相关性。在五种人体肥胖测量中,BAI是女性参与者中CVD危险因素的最佳预测因子(HOMA-IR的r =?0.593,TG / HDL的r =?0.542,SBP的r =?0.474,r =?对于DBP为0.448)。对于男性,WC(WHO-IR的r =?0.629,TG / HDL的r =?0.446)和WHR(SBP的r =?0.352,DBP的r =?0.366)的组合与CVD危险因素。结论在预测亚洲健康成年人的CVD危险因素中,PBF的测量并没有优于简单的肥胖症人体测量,即BAI,WC和WHR。尽管男性的中央肥胖指标(WC和WHR)倾向于显示与CVD危险因素的相关性更强,但一般肥胖(BAI)指标似乎是女性的最佳预测指标。肥胖指数与CVD危险因素之间的关联中的性别差异可能与居住在新加坡的男性和女性体内脂肪分布不同有关。这些结果可能会发现进一步的临床实用性,以更有效的方式识别患有CVD危险因素的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号