首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Capecitabine plus Irinotecan (XELIRI regimen) compared to 5-FU/LV plus Irinotecan (FOLFIRI regimen) as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with unresectable liver-only metastases of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised prospective phase II trial
【24h】

Capecitabine plus Irinotecan (XELIRI regimen) compared to 5-FU/LV plus Irinotecan (FOLFIRI regimen) as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with unresectable liver-only metastases of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised prospective phase II trial

机译:卡培他滨加伊立替康(XELIRI方案)与5-FU / LV加伊立替康(FOLFIRI方案)比较用于新辅助治疗转移性结直肠癌不可切除的仅肝转移的患者:一项随机的前瞻性II期临床研究

获取原文

摘要

Background Phase II studies have shown that the combination of capecitabine and irinotecan (the XELIRI regimen) is active in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). There are, however, no data about the use of the XELIRI regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment. Methods Patients with unresectable liver-only metastases of MCRC with ≤ 75 years of age were randomised to either the XELIRI (irinotecan 250 mg/m2 given on day one and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily from day 2–15, every 21 days) or the FOLFIRI arm (irinotecan 180 mg/m2, 5-FU 400 mg/m2, LV 200 mg/m2, 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 (46-h infusion) – all given on day one, every 14 days). Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and rate of radical (R0) surgical resection. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results Altogether 87 patients were enrolled (41 pts in the XELIRI and 46 pts in the FOLFIRI arm). The median age was 63 years (63 years in the XELIRI and 62 years in the FOLFIRI arm) (p = 0.33). ORR was 49% in the XELIRI and 48% in the FOLFIRI arm (p = 0.76). The rate of radical R0 resection was 24% in both arms of patients. At the end of treatment, 37% of patients in the XELIRI and 26% of patients in the FOLFIRI arm were without evidence of the disease (CR+R0 resection) (p = 0.56). There were no statistical differences in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between both arms: diarrhoea 7% vs. 6%, neutropenia 5% vs. 13%, ischemic stroke 0 vs. 2%, acute coronary syndrome 2% vs. 4%, respectively. At the median follow up of 17 (range 1–39) months, the median PFS was 10.3 months in the XELIRI and 9.3 months in the FOLFIRI arm (p = 0.78), the median OS was 30.7 months in the XELIRI arm and 16.6 months in the FOLFIRI arm (p = 0.16). Conclusion The XELIRI regimen showed similar ORR as the FOLFIRI regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with MCRC. In addition, the XELIRI regimen showed similar PFS and OS with acceptable toxicity compared to the FOLFIRI regimen. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN19912492
机译:背景II期研究表明,卡培他滨和伊立替康的组合(XELIRI方案)在转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)中具有活性。但是,尚无关于在新辅助治疗中使用XELIRI方案的数据。方法将年龄≤75岁的MCRC不可切除的仅发生肝转移的患者随机分为XELIRI(伊立替康250 mg / m 2 第1天和卡培他滨1000 mg / m 2) 从2-15天开始,每天21天两次,每21天一次)或FOLFIRI组(伊立替康180 mg / m 2 ,5-FU 400 mg / m 2 ,LV 200 mg / m 2 ,5-FU 2400 mg / m 2 (46小时输注)–在第一天,每14天给予一次)。主要终点为客观反应率(ORR)和根治性(R0)手术切除率。次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),总体生存期(OS)和安全性。结果共纳入87例患者(XELIRI组为41分,FOLFIRI组为46分)。中位年龄为63岁(XELIRI组为63岁,FOLFIRI组为62岁)(p = 0.33)。 XELIRI的ORR为49%,FOLFIRI的ORR为48%(p = 0.76)。两组患者的R0根治性切除率均为24%。在治疗结束时,XELIRI中37%的患者和FOLFIRI组中26%的患者没有疾病证据(CR + R0切除)(p = 0.56)。两组的3级或4级不良事件之间无统计学差异:腹泻7%对6%,中性粒细胞减少5%对13%,缺血性卒中0对2%,急性冠脉综合征2%对4%,分别。在中位随访17(1-39个月)时,XELIRI组中位PFS为10.3个月,FOLFIRI组中位PFS为9.3个月(p = 0.78),XELIRI组中位OS为30.7个月,16.6个月在FOLFIRI臂中(p = 0.16)。结论在新辅助治疗MCRC患者中,XELIRI方案的ORR与FOLFIRI方案相似。此外,与FOLFIRI方案相比,XELIRI方案显示出相似的PFS和OS,毒性可接受。试用注册现行对照试验ISRCTN19912492

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号