首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >How do medical students engaging in elective courses on acupuncture and homeopathy differ from unselected students? A survey
【24h】

How do medical students engaging in elective courses on acupuncture and homeopathy differ from unselected students? A survey

机译:参加针灸和顺势疗法选修课程的医学生与未选拔生有何不同?一项调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background We aimed to investigate whether students at German medical schools participating in elective courses on acupuncture and homeopathy differ from an unselected group of students regarding attitudes and personality traits. Methods Elective courses on acupuncture and homeopathy in the academic half-year 2013/14 all over Germany were identified and participants invited to fill in a questionnaire including nineteen questions on attitudes towards Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM), orientation towards science, care and status orientation, and a short validated instrument (Big-Five-Inventory-10) to measure personality traits (extraversion, neuroticism, openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness). Participants of a mandatory family medicine course at one university served as unselected control group. Results Two hundred twenty and 113 students from elective courses on acupuncture and homeopathy, respectively, and 315 control students participated (response rate 93%). Students participating in elective courses had much more positive attitudes towards CAM, somewhat lower science and status orientation, and somewhat higher care orientation than control group students (all p- values for three-group comparisons?Conclusions The findings of this study show that attitudes of students participating in elective courses on acupuncture or homeopathy at German medical schools differ to a considerable degree from the attitudes of unselected students.
机译:背景我们旨在调查参加针灸和顺势疗法选修课程的德国医学院的学生与态度和人格特质的未选学生群体是否不同。方法确定了2013/14学年整个德国的针灸和顺势疗法选修课,并邀请参与者填写问卷,其中包括关于补充和替代医学(CAM)的态度,对科学,保健和地位的态度的十九个问题方向和简短的经过验证的工具(Big-Five-Inventory-10)来衡量人格特质(外向,神经质,开放性,尽责性和好感)。一所大学的家庭医学必修课的参与者为未选对照组。结果针灸和顺势疗法选修课的学生分别为220名和113名,对照学生为315名(回应率为93%)。与对照组学生相比,参加选修课的学生对CAM的态度更为积极,科学和地位方面的态度较低,而护理方面的态度则较高(三组比较的所有p值?)在德国医学院参加针灸或顺势疗法选修课的学生与未选学生的态度有很大不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号