首页> 外文期刊>Design Studies >The Simon-Kroes model of technical artifacts and the distinction between science and design
【24h】

The Simon-Kroes model of technical artifacts and the distinction between science and design

机译:技术工件的Simon-Kroes模型以及科学与设计之间的区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is a long tradition of arguing that design and science are importantly different. One such argument is that the separation of science and design is an implication that can be drawn from the Simon-Kroes model of the nature of technical artifacts. This paper argues that the Simon-Kroes model does not imply a radical separation between science and design: if we accept the Simon-Kroes model of the nature of technical artifacts and their production, then we must also accept that all the sciences also produce technical artifacts, and in importantly similar ways. Moreover, the placing of both science and design in a naturalist framework reinforces this conclusion and opens up new vistas for synergetic cross-disciplinary discussion of design and methodology.
机译:争论由来已久的传统是,设计和科学是重要的不同。一个这样的论点是,科学与设计的分离是一种暗示,可以从技术工件性质的西蒙·克罗斯模型中得出。本文认为,Simon-Kroes模型并不意味着科学与设计之间的根本分离:如果我们接受技术人工制品及其生产的本质的Simon-Kroes模型,那么我们还必须接受所有科学也产生技术性的现象。文物,并且以类似的重要方式。此外,将科学和设计都放在自然主义的框架中可以强化这一结论,并为设计和方法论的跨学科协同讨论开辟新的前景。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Design Studies》 |2012年第5期|p.480-495|共16页
  • 作者

    Robert Farrell; Cliff Hooker;

  • 作者单位

    School of Humanities and Social Sciences,University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2305, Australia;

    School of Humanities and Social Sciences,University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2305, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    artifact; design science; design methodology; design theory; epistemology;

    机译:神器设计科学;设计方法;设计理论;认识论;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号