...
首页> 外文期刊>Informing science: The international journal of an emerging transdiscipline >Designing to Inform: Toward Conceptualizing Practitioner Audiences for Socio-technical Artifacts in Design Science Research in the Information Systems Discipline
【24h】

Designing to Inform: Toward Conceptualizing Practitioner Audiences for Socio-technical Artifacts in Design Science Research in the Information Systems Discipline

机译:设计告知:在信息系统学科的设计科学研究中,对从业人员受众的社会技术工件的概念进行概念化

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper identifies areas in the design science research (DSR) subfield of the information systems (IS) discipline where a more detailed consideration of practitioner audiences of socio-technical design artifacts could improve current IS DSR research practice and proposes an initial conceptualization of these audiences. The consequences of not considering artifact audiences are identified through a critical appraisal of the current informing science lenses in the IS DSR literature. There are specific shortcomings in four areas: 1) treating practice stakeholders as a too homogeneous group, 2) not explicitly distinguishing between social and technical parts of socio-technical artifacts, 3) neglecting implications of the artifact abstraction level, and 4) a lack of explicit consideration of a dynamic or evolutionary fitness perspective of socio-technical artifacts. The findings not only pave the way for future research to further improve the conceptualization of artifact audiences, in order to improve the informing power – and thus, impact on practice and research relevance – of IS DSR projects; they can also help to bridge the theory-practice gap in other disciplines (e.g. computer science, engineering, or policy-oriented sociology) that seek to produce social and/or technical artifacts of practical relevance.
机译:本文确定了信息系统(IS)学科的设计科学研究(DSR)子领域中的领域,在这些领域中,对社会技术设计工件的从业者受众进行更详细的考虑可以改善当前的IS DSR研究实践,并提出对这些受众的初步概念化。通过对IS DSR文献中当前的信息科学镜头进行严格评估,可以确定不考虑文物受众的后果。在四个方面存在特定的缺陷:1)将实践利益相关者视为过于单一的群体; 2)没有明确区分社会技术工件的社会和技术部分; 3)忽略工件抽象级别的含义; 4)缺乏明确考虑社会技术人工物品的动态或进化适应性观点。这些发现不仅为未来的研究铺平了道路,以进一步改善人工制品听众的概念化,从而提高IS DSR项目的知情权,从而提高其对实践和研究相关性的影响;它们还可以帮助弥合其他学科(例如计算机科学,工程学或政策导向的社会学)中试图产生具有实际意义的社会和/或技术制品的理论-实践差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号