首页> 外文期刊>Defense & Security Analysis >United States Marine Corps Aerial Refueling Requirements: Queuing Theory and Simulation Analysis
【24h】

United States Marine Corps Aerial Refueling Requirements: Queuing Theory and Simulation Analysis

机译:美国海军陆战队空中加油要求:排队论与模拟分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Static queuing models, which have been used to estimate USMC KC 130 aerial refueling requirements, do not incorporate the full complexity of refueling track performance. Queuing models do not account for the overlapping KC 130 sorties and drogue failures, or variable customer arrival rates and fuel demands. The first issue involves the ability to service aerial refueling customers in a timely manner (flow); the second issue involves the supply of fuel available for refueling customers (stock). Two simulation models were introduced to address these issues. An ARENA simulation model was used to analyze how overlapping KC130 sorties and drogue failure affect refueling track performance (expected time in the queue, average customers in the queue, and refueling track capacity utilization). A Crystal Ball simulation model was introduced to assess the impact of sortie duration on refueling track performance and the KC 130 requirement. The ARENA simulation model indicated that maintaining two KC 130s on-station provided a sufficient flow of fuel in the east theater, vice the three KC 130s suggested by the queuing model (considering drogue failures). Both models maintained two KC 130s on-station in the west. The Crystal Ball simulation model illustrated a tradeoff between sortie duration, KC 130s on-station and the probability of completing the scheduled sortie before issuing all available fuel. In some instances, it is cost-effective to maintain more than the required KC 130s on-station. This increases sortie duration and actually reduces the total KC130 requirement. More aircraft are required in each sortie, but fewer aircraft are required to provide the necessary rotational base. The results of this simulation were used to generate trade-offs between the KC130 requirement and the probability of providing a sufficient fuel supply at all times. Depending on both the refueling track performance desired and the variability of customer arrival rates and fuel demands, the KC 130 fixed-wing aerial refueling requirement ranges between 70 and 120 aircraft (with present value one generation life-cycle costs between $8,344 million and $14,304 million, respectively). Ultimately, the USMC must determine the appropriate balance between costs and performance. However, this topic is beyond the scope of this paper.
机译:静态排队模型已用于估计USMC KC 130空中加油需求,但并未包含加油轨道性能的全部复杂性。排队模型不能解决重叠的KC 130架次和锥套故障,也不能解决客户到达率和燃料需求变化的问题。第一个问题涉及及时为空中加油客户提供服务的能力(流程);第二个问题涉及为客户加油的可用燃料供应(库存)。引入了两个仿真模型来解决这些问题。 ARENA仿真模型用于分析重叠的KC130架次和锥套故障如何影响加油轨道的性能(预期的排队时间,排队的平均客户以及加油轨道的容量利用率)。引入了水晶球模拟模型,以评估出港时间对加油跑道性能和KC 130要求的影响。 ARENA仿真模型表明,在东部战区维持两个KC 130能够在现场提供足够的燃料流量,而与排队模型建议的三个KC 130相比(考虑了锥管故障)。两种型号都在西部维护了两个KC 130。水晶球仿真模型说明了在出动持续时间,KC 130的在站时间和在发出所有可用燃料之前完成计划出动的可能性之间的权衡。在某些情况下,在现场维护超过要求的KC 130更具成本效益。这增加了出击时间,实际上减少了KC130的总需求。每架飞机需要更多的飞机,但提供必要的旋转基地所需的飞机则更少。仿真结果被用来在KC130要求和始终提供足够燃料供应的可能性之间进行权衡。根据所需的加油轨道性能以及客户到达率和燃料需求的可变性,KC 130固定翼空中加油需求的范围在70到120架飞机之间(当前价值的一代生命周期成本在83.44亿美元至143.04亿美元之间) , 分别)。最终,USMC必须确定成本与绩效之间的适当平衡。但是,该主题超出了本文的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号