首页> 外文期刊>Dao >Hagen, Kurtis, The Philosophy of Xunzi: A Reconstruction
【24h】

Hagen, Kurtis, The Philosophy of Xunzi: A Reconstruction

机译:哈根·库蒂斯(Hagen,Kurtis),《 un子的哲学:重构》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Whereas some philosophy books can be so exceedingly complex as to frustrate anynattempt to offer a concise synopsis, Kurtis Hagen admirably maintains a straightforwardnthesis from beginning to end in The Philosophy of Xunzi. Put simply, Hagen argues againstna common theme in recent English-language studies of the Confucian thinker Xunzi 荀子.nSpecifically, he criticizes what he terms the “realist” reading of Xunzi and proposes insteadna “constructivist” interpretation. The “realist” view comprises a variety of elements, but thentwo most important ones for Hagen are, apparently the claims that Xunzi believes (1) therenis a single correct standard for morality and (2) this standard is not man-made, but rathernexists independently of humans. The “constructivist” reading, in contrast, maintains that fornXunzi such standards (1) are man-made, and not simply “given” features of the world, andn(2) more than one such standard is acceptable. Chapter One introduces these two positionsnand argues against the “realist” reading and for the “constructivist” one, focusing parti-ncularly on Xunzi’s discussions of the Way (dao 道). The subsequent chapters then extendnthis approach to other parts of the Xunzi that have often been taken to support a “realist”nview. Chapter Two analyzes Xunzi’s notions of “patterns” (li 理) and “categories” (lei 類),nChapter Three discusses his theory of language and naming, Chapter Four considers hisnconception of ritual, and Chapter Five finishes the book with a treatment of Xunzi’s viewsnon virtue and moral cultivation. The overall effect casts Xunzi as having a highly flexiblenmoral philosophy, one that allows for a wide variety of different moral practices.
机译:尽管有些哲学书过于复杂,以至于无法使任何试图提供一个简要提要的人感到沮丧,但库尔蒂斯·哈根(Kurtis Hagen)令人钦佩地在《 X子哲学》中始终保持着简单明了的思想。简而言之,哈根在儒家思想家荀子荀子的近期英语研究中反对一个共同的主题。特别是,他批评了他所说的X子的“现实主义”解读,并提出了“建构主义”的解释。 “现实主义”观点包括多种因素,但哈根最重要的两个观点显然是X子认为的观点:(1)那里有一个道德的正确标准;(2)这个标准不是人为的,而是nexexists独立于人类。相比之下,“建构主义”解读认为,fornXunzi这样的标准(1)是人为的,而不仅仅是世界的“给定”特征,并且n(2)可以接受不止一个这样的标准。第一章介绍了这两种立场,并反对“现实主义”和“建构主义”,特别是reading子对“道”的讨论。随后的各章将这种方法扩展到the子的其他部分,这些部分经常被用来支持“现实”的观点。第二章分析X子的“模式”和“类别”的概念,第三章讨论他的语言和命名理论,第四章考虑他对仪式的概念,第五章以X子的论述作为结尾。视而不见和道德修养。整体效果使X子具有高度灵活的道德哲学,这种哲学允许各种不同的道德实践。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2007年第4期|p.417-421|共5页
  • 作者

    Eric L. Hutton;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, 260 So. Central Campus Drive, OSH #345, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Hagen; Kurtis; Philosophy; Xunzi;

    机译:哈根库尔蒂斯哲学;X子;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:19:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号