首页> 外文学位 >The philosophy of Xunzi.
【24h】

The philosophy of Xunzi.

机译:un子的哲学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scholarship on Xunzi in English has been plagued by imprecise readings of the text and general philosophical naivete. It is hoped that this account will provide a sympathetic and accurate reading of this central thinker.;The Introduction addresses the problems of interpretation raised by the text at hand, and all philosophical texts like it. A method of "interpretation as integrity," modeled on the theory of "law as integrity" put forward by Ronald Dworkin, is finally defended and adopted.;Chapter I takes up Xunzi's celebrated criticism of the earlier philosopher Mencius, pointing out Xunzi's fundamental analogy between ruler and polity on the one hand, and mind and person on the other. The discussion leads to a consideration of Xunzi's philosophy of mind. It is concluded that the refutation of Mencius is no refutation at all, but an excellent point of departure for a study of Xunzi's thought.;Chapter II considers Xunzi's view of Heaven. Xunzi's mechanism is compared, and ultimately contrasted, with the deism of Tindal: there is a dimension to Xunzi's Heaven that finds no analogue in Tindal's cosmos. The chapter ends with a rejection of the commonplace that Xunzi is a conventionalist.;Chapter III begins with an overview of Western approaches to the problem of ritual, gravitating towards an emphasis on contractarianism, since this model comes closest to what we find in Xunzi. But it is shown how the differences between Xunzi and Hobbes, a frequent comparandum, highlight the unmistakable absolutism in Xunzi's style of contractarianism.;Chapter IV opens with an account of the Dialecticians, an unfederated group of sophists whom Xunzi criticized frequently and earnestly. The reasons behind Xunzi's animadversions are found in his theory of language. Despite the vast freedom of names that Xunzi allows, in anticipation of Saussure and others, Xunzi is shown not to countenance ontological relativity. Instead, Xunzi postulates a Way (dao), a universal ontology. The ramifications of this commitment are wide-ranging and contribute to the basic character of Xunzi's philosophy.
机译:对英语X子的奖学金一直受到文本的不精确阅读和普遍的天真哲学困扰。希望这种解释能对这个中心思想家提供同情和准确的理解。导言解决了手头的文本以及所有哲学文本提出的解释问题。最终以罗纳德·德沃金(Ronald Dworkin)提出的“法则为正当性”理论为模型的“解释为正当性”方法得到了捍卫和采用。第一章讨论takes子对早期哲学家孟子的著名批评,指出X子的基本类比一方面是统治者与政体之间的关系,另一方面是思想与人之间的关系。讨论引出了zi子的思想哲学。可以得出结论,孟子的反驳根本不是反驳,而是对X子思想研究的绝佳出发点。第二章,对X子的天观进行了探讨。 Tin子的机制与“廷达尔”的神性进行了比较,并最终形成了对比:zi子的天堂有一个维度与廷达的宇宙没有相似之处。本章以a子是传统主义者的常识为结尾。第三章首先概述了西方解决礼仪问题的方法,而倾向于强调契约主义,因为这种模式最接近zi子。但是,这表明shown子与霍布斯之间的差异是如何经常发生的比较,突显了of子的契约主义风格中的绝对专制主义;第四章以辩证者为开端。从X子的语言理论中可以找到X子变态的原因。尽管X子允许极大的名称自由,但在索绪尔和其他人的期待下,X子却被证明不尊重本体论的相对性。相反,X子提出了一种普遍的本体之道。这一承诺的后果是广泛的,并有助于X子哲学的基本特征。

著录项

  • 作者

    Goldin, Paul Rakita.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Literature Asian.;History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号