首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >A Rasch Measure of Fostering Creativity
【24h】

A Rasch Measure of Fostering Creativity

机译:培养创造力的Rasch措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A general creativity questionnaire of 21 stem-items was designed and based on 7 teaching aspects of fostering creativity in higher education students: (a) teaching the skills and attitudes of creativity; (b) teaching the creative methods of the disciplines; (c) developing a problem-friendly classroom; (d) using prior knowledge; (e) using different types of problems; (f) using multi-disciplinary hands-on projects; and (g) using appropriate lesson plans. Stem-items (21) based on these were conceptualized from easy to hard—3 stem-items for each of the 7 aspects—and answered in 2 perspectives: (a) an attitude self-view (ideally this is what I think I should do) and (b) a behavior self-view (this is what I actually do)—using 3 ordered response categories: none or some of the time (score 1), most of the time (score 2), and all of the time (score 3). This meant that the effective item sample was 42. The general questionnaire was applied to a lecturer sample from a higher institution, N = 124. Data were analyzed with a Rasch measurement model computer program. The item-trait interaction chi-square was not statistically significant (χ2 = 87.6, df = 84, p = 0.37), meaning that a unidimensional trait (called fostering creativity) was measured in which the 42 items each fitted the measurement model with p  0.02. The Person Separation Index was 0.78 and the Cronbach Alpha was 0.79 showing that the measures were well-separated along the scale in comparison to the errors.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481534
机译:设计了一个由21个词干项组成的一般性创造力调查表,并根据7个教学方面对高等教育学生进行创造力培养:(a)教授创造力的技能和态度; (b)教授各学科的创新方法; (c)建立一个友好的教室; (d)利用先验知识; (e)使用不同类型的问题; (f)使用多学科的动手项目; (g)使用适当的课程计划。基于这些概念的词干项目(21个)从易到难概念化(针对7个方面的3个词干项目),并从两个角度进行了回答:(a)态度自我查看(理想情况下,我认为这是我应该这样做)和(b)行为自视图(这是我实际上所做的)–使用3种有序的响应类别:无时间或某些时间(得分1),大部分时间(得分2),和所有时间(得分3)。这意味着有效项目样本为42。一般调查表应用于来自更高机构N = 124的讲师样本。使用Rasch测量模型计算机程序分析数据。项目-特征相互作用卡方在统计学上不显着(χ 2 = 87.6,df = 84,p = 0.37),这意味着一维特征(称为培养创造力)是其中42个项目均与p> 0.02的测量模型相符。人员分离指数为0.78,Cronbach Alpha为0.79,表明与错误相比,度量在尺度上是完全分开的。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = { citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481534

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号