【24h】

Book Reviews

机译:书评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Between Science and Literature: An Introduction to Autopoetics, Ira Livingston, focusing on performativity, treats the text itself as occasion for play. He coins terms such as "autopoetics" (his renaming of autopoiesis-self-making, minus the "i," which has traditionally stood for a discrete self), writes creative interludes that build "epistemological art" using household items (in his words, "Michel Fou-cault meets Martha Stewart"), and even provides stage directions (a quoted passage about eugenics should be read in a "Dr. Strangelove accent"). All of this playing, however, has a serious point: to look at the possibilities of theory in the here-and-now requires testing the limits of our own imagination. As Livingston states: "[O]ne can still ask productively of a theory: What can it do and where can it go? What is it possible to think and to do with it, and what kinds of things or thoughts does it make more difficult or unintelligible?" (10). These questions invariably raise the issue of self-reference, and Livingston considers the ways that systems loop in on themselves at all levels.
机译:在《科学与文学之间:自律学概论》中,艾拉·利文斯顿(Ira Livingston)着眼于表演性,将文本本身视为玩耍的机会。他创造了诸如“ autopoetics”(他的autopoiesis-self-making的重命名,减去了“ i”(传统上代表离散的自我)的意思)之类的词汇,并写了一些创造性的插曲,用家居用品建造“认识论艺术”(用他的话说) ,“米歇尔·富克与玛莎·斯图尔特见面”),甚至提供了舞台指导(有关优生学的引用段落应在“奇异博士博士的口音”中阅读)。但是,所有这些游戏都有一个严肃的观点:要在当前和现实中看待理论的可能性,就需要测试我们自己的想象力的极限。正如利文斯顿所说:“ [奥]仍然可以有效率地对一个理论提出疑问:它可以做什么,它可以去哪里?可以思考和处理它什么?它可以使什么事物或想法变得更多?困难还是难以理解?” (10)。这些问题总是引起自我参照的问题,利文斯顿考虑了系统在各个层面上自我循环的方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Configurations》 |2006年第3期|303-305|共3页
  • 作者

    John Bruni;

  • 作者单位

    South Dakota School of Mines & Technology;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号