首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Security >Authorship disambiguation in a collaborative editing environment
【24h】

Authorship disambiguation in a collaborative editing environment

机译:在协作编辑环境中消除作者身份歧义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"Wikipedia", known as the world's largest online free encyclopedia, is one of the remarkable examples of crowdsourcing, where millions of articles have been produced by volunteers from all over the world. Wikipedia allows anyone to edit articles without being prescreened or authorized. A user can edit articles using either a valid ID or an IP address. The freedom of editing using ID or IP makes editorial identities ambiguous. This may affect the integrity of the research process. It also facilitates malicious users to vandalize Wikipedia content. Disambiguation of users' identity in Wikipedia can assist in distinguishing between trusted and mischievous users and more important in defining authorship in a less ambiguous manner. The present paper introduces a new methodology to ascertain Wikipedia authorship and to reduce ambiguity of user Ins. Our methodology uses the editing activity of users as a distinguishing feature for identifying non -ambiguous profiles. Reducing ambiguity of authorship can facilitate understanding of human behavior in collaborative editing, predicting sock puppetry (duplicate accounts), detecting anomaly, identifying trustworthy as well as offensive authors, and in improving security procedures and research in online social media. Our experimental results indicate that it is possible to disambiguate with high degree of certainty the editorial activity by 75% at rank 1. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:“维基百科”(Wikipedia),被称为世界上最大的在线免费百科全书,是众包的非凡例子之一,来自世界各地的志愿者制作了数百万篇文章。维基百科允许任何人编辑文章而无需预先筛选或授权。用户可以使用有效的ID或IP地址来编辑文章。使用ID或IP进行编辑的自由性使编辑身份变得模棱两可。这可能会影响研究过程的完整性。它还有助于恶意用户破坏Wikipedia内容。在Wikipedia中消除用户身份的歧义可以帮助区分受信任的用户和淘气的用户,并且在以较少歧义的方式定义作者身份时更重要。本文介绍了一种确定维基百科作者身份并减少用户Ins歧义的新方法。我们的方法使用用户的编辑活动作为识别非歧义配置文件的区别功能。减少作者身份的歧义可以促进人们在协作编辑,预测袜子木偶(重复帐户),检测异常,识别值得信赖的作者以及令人反感的作者等方面的行为,并改善安全程序和在线社交媒体的研究。我们的实验结果表明,可以高度确定性地将排名1的编辑活动消除75%的歧义。(C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号