首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Computers >Lightweight Ciphers and Their Side-Channel Resilience
【24h】

Lightweight Ciphers and Their Side-Channel Resilience

机译:轻量级的纤维和它们的侧面渠道弹性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Side-channel attacks represent a powerful category of attacks against cryptographic devices. Still, side-channel analysis for lightweight ciphers is much less investigated than for instance for AES. Although intuition may lead to the conclusion that lightweight ciphers are weaker in terms of side-channel resistance, that remains to be confirmed and quantified. In this paper, we consider various side-channel analysis metrics which should provide an insight on the resistance of lightweight ciphers against side-channel attacks. In particular, for the non-profiled scenario we use the theoretical confusion coefficient and empirical optimal distinguisher. Our study considers side-channel attacks on the first, the last, or both rounds simultaneously. Furthermore, we conduct a profiled side-channel analysis using various machine learning attacks to recover 4-bit and 8-bit intermediate states of the cipher. Our results show that the difference between AES and lightweight ciphers is smaller than one would expect, and even find scenarios in which lightweight ciphers may be more resistant. Interestingly, we observe that the studied 4-bit S-boxes have a different side-channel resilience, while the difference in the 8-bit ones is only theoretically present.
机译:侧通道攻击代表了对加密设备的强大攻击类别。仍然,轻量级密码的侧通道分析远低于例如AES的调查。尽管直觉可能导致结论,但在侧通道电阻方面的轻质密度米较弱,仍有待确认和量化。在本文中,我们考虑了各种侧通道分析指标,该指标应对轻质密码的电阻识别在侧通道攻击中。特别是,对于非分布式场景,我们使用理论混淆系数和经验最优算子。我们的研究同时考虑了第一轮,最后一个或两个轮的侧频攻击。此外,我们使用各种机器学习攻击进行分析的侧通道分析,以恢复密码的4位和8位中间状态。我们的研究结果表明,AES和轻量级密码之间的差异小于一个人的期望,甚至发现轻质密度米的方案可能更具抵抗力。有趣的是,我们观察到所研究的4位S箱具有不同的侧沟弹性,而8位的4位S箱具有不同的差异仅在理论上存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号