首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >An interaction effect between young children's field dependence-independence and order of learning with glass-box and black-box simulations: Evidence for the malleability of cognitive style in computer-supported learning
【24h】

An interaction effect between young children's field dependence-independence and order of learning with glass-box and black-box simulations: Evidence for the malleability of cognitive style in computer-supported learning

机译:幼儿的场依赖性和学习顺序之间的相互作用与玻璃盒和黑盒模拟:计算机支持学习中认知风格可塑性的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A counterbalanced measures design was used to examine whether the order of learning with a glass-box simulation about the life cycle of butterflies, and, a black-box simulation about the life of bees, differentially affected field-dependent and field-independent children's performance on two related knowledge tests. The children aged from 5 to 6.5 years old were classified into a field type based on their Children's Embedded Figures Test scores. Subsequently, they were assigned into Group A and Group B. Group A learned first with the glass-box simulation followed by the black-box simulation, while Group B used the tools in the reverse order. A statistically significant interaction effect was found between field type and order of learning with the simulations on the butterfly post-test performance, showing that learning first with the black-box simulation facilitated field-dependent children's subsequent learning with the glass-box simulation. The results tap on the issue about whether field dependence independence is a cognitive ability or cognitive style, and the issue of the malleability of cognitive styles as well. Implications and future research directions are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:采用平衡措施设计,通过关于蝴蝶生命周期的玻璃盒模拟和关于蜜蜂寿命的黑盒模拟来检验学习顺序是否受到不同影响的田间和非田间儿童的表现两个相关的知识测试。 5至6.5岁的儿童根据其“儿童嵌入式数字测试”分数被分为字段类型。随后,他们被分配到A组和B组。A组首先通过玻璃盒模拟学习,然后是黑盒模拟,而B组以相反的顺序使用工具。在蝴蝶类型的测试后成绩上,通过模拟发现了场类型和学习顺序之间的统计学显着交互作用,表明通过黑盒模拟进行的第一个学习可以促进与场有关的孩子随后通过玻璃盒模拟的学习。结果涉及领域依赖独立性是认知能力还是认知风格的问题,以及认知风格的可塑性的问题。涵义和未来的研究方向进行了讨论。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号