首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >Comparison of oral examination and electronic examination using paired multiple-choice questions
【24h】

Comparison of oral examination and electronic examination using paired multiple-choice questions

机译:配对多项选择题对口试和电子考试的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the present research was to compare the use of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) as an examination method against the oral examination (OE) method. MCQs are widely used and their importance seems likely to grow, due to their inherent suitability for electronic assessment. However, MCQs are influenced by the tendency of examinees to guess answers, warranting research concerning scoring rules different from the simple positive-grades-only scores rule. Alternatively, OE is used in tertiary education, since it enables the assessment of intellectual capabilities and personal traits to a level not found in most other examination formats. However, the significant resource requirements of OE, especially in structured forms, might excessively strain the resources of academic institutions. In the present study, an MCQ test was given to examinees, in the framework of a computer-based learning system. The same examinees took also an OE possessing elements of structure, with three examiners concurrently and independently grading each of the examinees. In the MCQs examination a set of pairs of MCQs was composed. The MCQs in each pair were similar concerning the same topic, but this similarity was not evident for an examinee that did not possess adequate knowledge on the topic addressed in the questions of the pair. The scoring of the paired questions avoided the procedure of mixed-scoring, i.e., both positive and negative markings, while at the same time a pair-wise bonus/penalty scoring rule was adopted. The results of the "paired" MCQs examination, when using the pair-wise scoring rule, were statistically indistinguishable with the grades produced by the OE, when made to the same sample of students, on the same topics and with the same levels of difficult. Both the results of the paired MCQs examination, when using the pair-wise scoring rule, and the OE results differed significantly from those obtained by scoring the same MCQs using a positive-grades-only scoring rule that ignored the pairing of MCQs.
机译:本研究的目的是将选择题(MCQs)作为一种考试方法与口试(OE)方法进行比较。 MCQ被广泛使用,由于其固有的适用于电子评估的功能,其重要性似乎有可能增加。但是,MCQ受考生猜测答案的趋势的影响,因此有必要进行有关不同于简单的仅成绩等级分数规则的评分规则的研究。另外,OE也可用于高等教育,因为它可以将智力能力和个人特质评估到大多数其他考试形式所没有的水平。但是,OE的大量资源需求,尤其是结构化形式的资源需求,可能会过度占用学术机构的资源。在本研究中,在基于计算机的学习系统的框架内,对考生进行了MCQ测试。同一名考生还采用了具有结构要素的OE,其中三名考官同时并独立地为每位考生评分。在MCQ考试中,组成了一组成对的MCQ。每对中的MCQ在相同主题上相似,但是对于没有充分了解该对问题中所涉及主题的考生,这种相似性并不明显。配对问题的计分避免了混合计分的程序,即正负分数。同时,采用了成对的加分/罚分计分规则。当使用成对计分规则时,“配对” MCQs考试的结果与OE所产生的成绩在统计学上是无法区分的,而OE的成绩是针对相同的学生样本,相同的主题且难度相同。使用成对评分规则时,配对MCQ考试的结果和OE结果均与使用仅正成绩评分规则忽略了MCQ配对的相同MCQ评分所得的结果显着不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号