首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Education Development >Comparison multiple-choice questions quality parameters of pediatric, general surgery, internal medicine and genecology and obstetrics residency tests between preboard examination of Tabriz University of medical sciences and national board examination in 2010 and 2011
【24h】

Comparison multiple-choice questions quality parameters of pediatric, general surgery, internal medicine and genecology and obstetrics residency tests between preboard examination of Tabriz University of medical sciences and national board examination in 2010 and 2011

机译:大不里士医科大学预科考试与2010年和2011年国家委员会考试之间的儿科,普外科,内科和妇产科住院医师的多项选择题质量参数比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and objectives: The multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are the most commonly used type of test items in medical education examinations. This method could be reliable tool for guarantee of education quality if develop carefully and according to standard test preparation criteria. This study aimed to compare some quality indicators of multiple-choice questions of pediatric, general surgery, internal medicine and genecology and obstetrics residency in pediatric residency promotion examinations (2010 and 2011) held at the Tabriz university medical science (TUMS), with board certification questions in these disciplines during the above years, and special consideration for improved quality management and monitoring of university internal examinations. Methods and Materials: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated 2400 MCQs format of preboard examination of (TUMS) and national board examination in these disciplines. Individual MCQs evaluated for taxonomy levels (Bloom levels I, II and III) and following structural principles (based on Millman check list). Data analyzed by SPSS (version 18) software. Results: Quality of MCQs in preboard examination of (TUMS) and national board examination in these disciplines was different and this difference was significance in some discipline. We find more perfect quality in national board MCQs examinations in general surgery and in preboard examination of (TUMS) in internal medicine. Pediatric and general surgery residency preboard MCQs examinations of (TUMS) were significantly low level of learning in comparing to national board MCQs examinations,and had more structural problems. Conclusion: To prevent descending quality of national and internal university examinations, management and monitoring of these exams is recommended.
机译:背景和目的:多项选择题(MCQ)是医学教育考试中最常用的测试项目类型。如果认真开发并按照标准的考试准备标准,此方法可能是保证教育质量的可靠工具。这项研究旨在比较在大不里士大学医学(TUMS)举行的小儿住院医师促进考试(2010和2011)中对儿科,普外科,内科和遗传学以及妇产科住院医师的多项选择题的一些质量指标过去几年中这些学科的问题,并特别考虑了改善质量管理和大学内部考试的监控。方法和材料:在这项横断面研究中,我们评估了这些学科的2400个MCQs格式的董事会前考试(TUMS)和国家委员会考试。各个MCQ评估了分类标准(I,II和III等级)和遵循的结构原理(基于Millman清单)。通过SPSS(版本18)软件分析的数据。结果:在这些学科的预科(TUMS)考试和国家委员会考试中,MCQs的质量有所不同,这种差异在某些学科中具有重要意义。我们在普通外科的国家委员会MCQs考试和内科(TUMS)的前板检查中发现更完美的质量。与全国委员会MCQs考试相比,儿科和普通外科住院医师对MCMS考试的学习水平明显较低,并且存在更多的结构性问题。结论:为防止国家和内部大学考试的质量下降,建议对这些考试进行管理和监控。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号