首页> 外文期刊>Computers and Composition >Of flags: Online queer identities, writing classrooms, and action horizons
【24h】

Of flags: Online queer identities, writing classrooms, and action horizons

机译:标记:在线酷儿身份,写作教室和行动视野

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article I argue that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and queer pedagogies have been too exclusively focused on identity. The problem with these identity-based pedagogies is that they cannot fully account for actual LGBT identities, due in part to a continued multiplication of these identities online. I use LGBT pride flags to illustrate the ways in which these identities have proliferated, presenting a theoretical limit for current understandings of queer and LGBT pedagogy. As an alternative, I introduce the notion of the action horizon, which forms a pedagogy that encourages students to imagine themselves as actors in the public sphere, shaping policies and confronting complex real-world problems. The various LGBT pride flags then serve as material in three examples— an online asynchronous discussion, writing in a computer classroom, and paper assignments—all of which prompt students to enact the action horizon. Despite the possibilities for real-world engagement offered by the action horizon, success with this pedagogy can be limited in terms of LGBT issues, and so I end with some consideration of the implications and limitations of this kind of teaching.
机译:在本文中,我认为女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,变性者(LGBT)和同志教育法过于注重身份认同。这些基于身份的教学法的问题在于,它们不能完全说明实际的LGBT身份,部分原因是这些身份在网上不断繁殖。我使用LGBT骄傲标志来说明这些身份的扩散方式,为当前对酷儿和LGBT教育学的理解提供了理论上的限制。作为替代方案,我介绍了行动视野的概念,它构成了一种教育学,鼓励学生将自己想象成公共领域的参与者,制定政策并应对复杂的现实世界问题。然后,在三个示例(在线异步讨论,在计算机教室中编写以及纸上作业)的三个示例中,各种LGBT骄傲标志用作材料。所有这些标志都促使学生制定行动视野。尽管行动视野提供了现实世界中参与的可能性,但这种教学法的成功可能会因LGBT问题而受到限制,因此,我在最后考虑了这种教学的含义和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号