首页> 外文期刊>Computational Geosciences >Bayesian analysis of the impact of rainfall data product on simulated slope failure for North Carolina locations
【24h】

Bayesian analysis of the impact of rainfall data product on simulated slope failure for North Carolina locations

机译:贝叶斯探析降雨数据产品对北卡罗来纳地区模拟边坡失效的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the past decades, many different approaches have been developed in the literature to quantify the load-carrying capacity and geotechnical stability (or the factor of safety, F-s) of variably saturated hillslopes. Much of this work has focused on a deterministic characterization of hillslope stability. Yet, simulated F-s values are subject to considerable uncertainty due to our inability to characterize accurately the soil mantle's properties (hydraulic, geotechnical, and geomorphologic) and spatiotemporal variability of the moisture content of the hillslope interior. This is particularly true at larger spatial scales. Thus, uncertainty-incorporating analyses of physically based models of rain-induced landslides are rare in the literature. Such landslide modeling is typically conducted at the hillslope scale using gauge-based rainfall forcing data with rather poor spatiotemporal coverage. For regional landslide modeling, the specific advantages and/or disadvantages of gauge-only, radar-merged and satellite-based rainfall products are not clearly established. Here, we compare and evaluate the performance of the Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-based Regional Slope-stability analysis (TRIGRS) model for three different rainfall products using 112 observed landslides in the period between 2004 and 2011 from the North Carolina Geological Survey database. Our study includes the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis Version 7 (TMPA V7), the North American Land Data Assimilation System Phase 2 (NLDAS-2) analysis, and the reference truth Stage IV precipitation. TRIGRS model performance was rather inferior with the use of literature values of the geotechnical parameters and soil hydraulic properties from ROSETTA using soil textural and bulk density data from SSURGO (Soil Survey Geographic database). The performance of TRIGRS improved considerably after Bayesian estimation of the parameters with the DiffeRential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) algorithm using Stage IV precipitation data. Hereto, we use a likelihood function that combines binary slope failure information from landslide event and null periods using multivariate frequency distribution-based metrics such as the false discovery and false omission rates. Our results demonstrate that the Stage IV-inferred TRIGRS parameter distributions generalize well to TMPA and NLDAS-2 precipitation data, particularly at sites with considerably larger TMPA and NLDAS-2 rainfall amounts during landslide events than null periods. TRIGRS model performance is then rather similar for all three rainfall products. At higher elevations, however, the TMPA and NLDAS-2 precipitation volumes are insufficient and their performance with the Stage IV-derived parameter distributions indicates their inability to accurately characterize hillslope stability.
机译:在过去的几十年中,文献中已经开发了许多不同的方法,以量化可变饱和山坡的承载能力和岩土工程稳定性(或安全系数F-S因子)。这项工作的大部分都集中在山坡稳定性的确定性表征。然而,模拟的F-S值受到相当大的不确定性,因为我们无法准确地表征土壤披风的性质(液压,岩土和几形)和山坡内部水分含量的时空可变性。在较大的空间尺度上尤其如此。因此,在文献中,基于雨诱导的滑坡模型的不确定性分析是罕见的。这种滑坡建模通常在山坡秤上使用基于仪表的降雨强制迫使数据具有相当差的时空覆盖率。对于区域山体滑坡建模,唯一的速度,雷达合并和卫星的降雨产品的具体优势和/或缺点也没有明确建立。在此,我们比较和评估在北卡罗来纳地理调查数据库2004年至2011年期间的112期间使用112个观察到的山体滑坡的三种不同降雨产品的瞬态降雨渗透和基于网格的区域坡度稳定性分析(Trigrs)模型的性能。我们的研究包括热带降雨测量任务(TRMM)多卫星降水分析版本7(TMPA V7),北美土地数据同化系统2(NLDAS-2)分析,以及参考真理阶段IV降水。使用来自SSURGO(土壤调查地理数据库)的土壤纹理和批量密度数据,使用岩土地参数和土壤液压特性的文献价值,使用岩土地参数和土壤液压特性的文献性能相当劣等。使用阶段IV降水数据的差异演进自适应大都会(Dream)算法的差异演进自适应大都市(Dream)算法的参数,Trigrs的性能显着提高了显着的改善。 HERETO,我们使用了使用基于多变频分布的度量的LANDSLIDE事件和空周期的二进制斜率故障信息,例如虚假发现和假遗漏速率的似然函数。我们的结果表明,阶段IV推断的Trigrs参数分布概括到TMPA和NLDAS-2降水数据,特别是在Landslide事件中具有相当大的TMPA和NLDAS-2降雨量的地点而不是空周期。 Trigrs模型性能对所有三种降雨产品相似。然而,在较高的升高处,TMPA和NLDAS-2降水量不足,并且它们与阶段IV衍生参数分布的性能表明它们无法准确地表征Hillslope稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号