首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Neuropsychiatry >Temporal consciousness and confabulation: Is the medial temporal lobe “temporal”?
【24h】

Temporal consciousness and confabulation: Is the medial temporal lobe “temporal”?

机译:时间意识和虚构:内侧颞叶是否为“颞叶”?

获取原文
       

摘要

Since the early descriptions of this phenomenon, there is a large consensus on the distinction between two forms of confabulation. Provoked confabulations are plausible minor memory distortions in response to direct questioning, whereas spontaneous confabulations are unprovoked, often implausible, memories. However, as we show with the analysis of 284 provoked and 52 spontaneous confabulations produced by eight patients with confabulatory syndromes of different aetiologies, the provoked/spontaneous distinction fails to capture the quality of the great majority of confabulations that clearly do not fall in either of the two poles of the distinction. In this study, the majority of provoked (52%) and spontaneous (73%) confabulations consisted of what we refer to as “general memories, habits, and misplacements”, i.e., either true episodes misplaced in time and place, or personal habits and routines which are considered by the patient as specific personal episodes. These observations are discussed within the framework of the Memory, Consciousness, and Temporality Theory. According to this theory, confabulation reflects an abnormal functioning of temporal consciousness (TC). The integrity of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and related structures is crucial for the normal functioning of TC. Data from the literature show that what confabulators have in common is not a specific lesion site but rather the integrity of the MTL, which is consistent with the idea that the MTL is essential for the function of normal and confabulatory TC. In this sense the MTL is “temporal”, because its integrity allows individuals to be consciously aware of a personal past, present and future. A better understanding of TC, including its neurobiological correlates, will help to better understand confabulation avoiding theoretically untenable and experimentally undemonstrated explanatory idols like memory traces and unconscious monitoring.View full textDownload full textKeywordsConfabulation, Temporal Consciousness, Medial temporal lobeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546800902758017
机译:自从对这种现象的早期描述以来,人们就两种虚构形式之间的区别达成了广泛共识。挑衅的虚构是对直接询问的合理的轻微记忆扭曲,而自发虚构则是无端的,通常是令人难以置信的记忆。但是,正如我们通过分析由八位病因不同的虚构综合症患者产生的284例诱发性和52例自发性虚构所显示的那样,所引起/自发的区分无法反映出明显不属于任何一种的绝大多数虚构体的质量。区别的两个方面。在这项研究中,大多数挑衅(52%)和自发(73%)的捏造包括我们所说的“一般记忆,习惯和错位”,即,真实的情节在时间和地点错位,或被患者视为特定个人发作的个人习惯和习惯。这些观察是在记忆,意识和暂时性理论的框架内讨论的。根据该理论,虚构反映了时间意识(TC)的异常功能。内侧颞叶(MTL)和相关结构的完整性对于TC的正常功能至关重要。来自文献的数据表明,制造商的共同点不是特定的病变部位,而是MTL的完整性,这与MTL对于正常和制造型TC的功能至关重要的想法是一致的。从这个意义上讲,MTL是“时间性的”,因为它的完整性允许个人有意识地意识到个人的过去,现在和将来。更好地了解TC,包括其神经生物学相关性,将有助于更好地了解虚构,从而避免出现理论上站不住脚且实验上无法证明的解释性偶像,例如记忆痕迹和无意识的监测。 “泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546800902758017

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号