首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Biomarkers >Diagnostic and prognostic tissuemarkers in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma
【24h】

Diagnostic and prognostic tissuemarkers in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma

机译:透明细胞和乳头状肾细胞癌的诊断和预后组织标志物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Approximately one-third of all Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing a nephrectomy face metastatic disease. The availability of novel therapeutics for metastatic patients underscores the importance of identifying patients at risk of recurrence or patients responding well to specific therapies. Unlike clear cell RCC (ccRCC), information on biomarkers for the papillary subtype (pRCC) remains limited. In this review, we identified tissue markers that are differentially expressed between subtypes and may be of diagnostic use. In addition, markers with promising prognostic power for ccRCC and/or pRCC are described and their clinical value is discussed. Materials and methods: To identify diagnostic markers that differentiate between pRCC and ccRCC a Pubmed search was performed, limited to original articles published in the English language between 1990 and 2009, using the terms pRCC/papillary RCC/papillary renal cell carcinoma/papillary kidney cancer, biomarker/biomarkers, protein expression, mass spectrometry and immunohistochemistry. Prognostic markers for ccRCC and pRCC were identified using the search terms kidney cancer, renal cell carcinoma, prognostic marker, biomarker and prognosis. Only markers with independent prognostic value in multivariable analysis were included. Results: 25 proteins are differentially expressed between ccRCC and pRCC, reflecting the molecularly distinct nature of these subtypes. 5 of these proteins were externally validated, which shows their diagnostic potential. Whereas 48 biomarkers with independent prognostic power have been identified for ccRCC patients, only CD44, CA9, p53, Ki67 and PCNA have shown prognostic value in multiple studies. Expression of IMP-3 and VEGF-R2 are independent predictors of survival of pRCC patients, although this is shown in single studies. Conclusions: So far 5 validated diagnostic markers are able to differentiate between ccRCC and pRCC. Few independent prognostic markers have been identified for pRCC in single studies, compared to numerous biomarkers identified for the more common ccRCC. Despite the abundance of promising markers for ccRCC, their exact role in clinical decision making still needs to be established through validation studies.
机译:目的:接受肾切除术的所有肾细胞癌(RCC)患者中约有三分之一患有转移性疾病。对于转移性患者而言,新型治疗方法的可用性强调了鉴定有复发风险的患者或对特定疗法反应良好的患者的重要性。与透明细胞RCC(ccRCC)不同,关于乳头状亚型(pRCC)的生物标志物的信息仍然有限。在这篇综述中,我们确定了亚型之间差异表达的组织标志物,可能具有诊断意义。此外,描述了对ccRCC和/或pRCC具有良好预后能力的标志物,并讨论了其临床价值。材料和方法:为了鉴定可区分pRCC和ccRCC的诊断标记物,进行了Pubmed搜索,仅限于1990年至2009年间以英文发表的原始文章,使用了术语pRCC /乳头RCC /乳头状肾细胞癌/乳头状肾癌,生物标志物/生物标志物,蛋白质表达,质谱和免疫组化。 ccRCC和pRCC的预后标志物使用搜索词肾癌,肾细胞癌,预后标志物,生物标志物和预后进行鉴定。仅包括在多变量分析中具有独立预后价值的标志物。结果:25种蛋白质在ccRCC和pRCC之间差异表达,反映了这些亚型的分子独特性质。这些蛋白质中有5种在外部进行了验证,显示了其诊断潜力。尽管已为ccRCC患者确定了48种具有独立预后能力的生物标志物,但在多项研究中只有CD44,CA9,p53,Ki67和PC​​NA显示了预后价值。 IMP-3和VEGF-R2的表达是pRCC患者生存的独立预测因子,尽管单项研究显示。结论:到目前为止,有5种经过验证的诊断标记能够区分ccRCC和pRCC。与针对更常见的ccRCC鉴定出的众多生物标志物相比,在单个研究中很少鉴定出pRCC的独立预后标志物。尽管ccRCC的标志物很多,但它们在临床决策中的确切作用仍然需要通过验证研究来确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号