首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge Journal of Education >Civic education curriculum reform in Hong Kong: What should be the direction under Chinese sovereignty?
【24h】

Civic education curriculum reform in Hong Kong: What should be the direction under Chinese sovereignty?

机译:香港的公民教育课程改革:中国主权下的方向应该是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article uses results from a cross-national analysis of the impact of varying approaches to civic education curriculum delivery on three learning outcomes, to draw conclusions about the value of a government-mandated compulsory, independent subject of civic education in the school curriculum. It starts from the context of Hong Kong, where there have been repeated calls for the government to reform civic education, and compares this context with that of England, where citizenship education was made a statutory subject in 2002. The article then examines from the cases of 25 societies whether a compulsory approach to and/or independent subject of civic education is associated with better learning of civic knowledge, knowledge of democracy, and patriotism. Finding that the impact of curricular approaches is somewhat negligible taking other factors into consideration, the article concludes that civic education reformers should consider the costs of limiting school autonomy in curriculum delivery.View full textDownload full textKeywordscitizenship education, civic education, Hong Kong, curriculum reform, policy instruments, democracy, patriotismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.625000
机译:本文使用对各种公民教育课程交付方法对三种学习成果的影响进行跨国分析的结果,得出有关政府强制性义务独立公民教育课程在学校课程中的价值的结论。它始于香港的背景,在此背景下,香港曾多次呼吁政府改革公民教育,并与英国的情况进行了比较。英格兰在2002年将公民教育定为法定主题。在25个社会中,是否必须对公民教育采取强制性方法和/或将其作为独立学科与更好地学习公民知识,民主知识和爱国主义有关?考虑到其他因素的影响,课程方法的影响可以忽略不计,因此得出结论,公民教育改革者应考虑限制课程交付中学校自主权的成本。查看全文下载全文关键字公民教育,香港,课程改革,政策工具,民主,爱国主义相关的变量add add_id -4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.625000

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号