...
首页> 外文期刊>Building >Clash points
【24h】

Clash points

机译:冲突点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I believe in Adjudication. Main contractors were strongly in favour of statutory adjudication being included in the Construction Act and we lobbied as hard as anyone to make sure it was there. I want to make that clear at the outset, because Rudi will undoubtedly regard the argument I am about to make as a root-and-branch attack on the concept. In my view, an adjudication clause that gives the adjudicator the option of ordering the money to be paid to a stakeholder is legal under the Construction Act. David Mosey of Trowers & Hamlins Solicitors explained in Building (8 January, page 64) why he was recommending a stakeholder provision to his clients, and made a very cogent and practical case for doing so. What he did not explore in any detail was whether this type of provision complies with the requirements of section 108 of the act.
机译:我相信裁决。主要承包商强烈赞成将法定裁决纳入《建筑法》,我们竭尽全力游说以确保它在那里。我想一开始就阐明这一点,因为鲁迪无疑会将我将要提出的论点视为对该概念的根本性攻击。我认为,根据《建设法》,赋予裁决人选择下令支付给利益相关者款项的裁决条款是合法的。 Trowers&Hamlins律师事务所的David Mosey在大楼(1月8日,第64页)中解释了为什么他向客户推荐利益相关者条款,并为此提出了非常有说服力和实际的案例。他没有详细探讨的是这种规定是否符合该法令第108节的要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |1999年第4期|p.56|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号