...
首页> 外文期刊>British Food Journal >'Palm oil free' vs 'sustainable palm oil': the impact of claims on consumer perception
【24h】

'Palm oil free' vs 'sustainable palm oil': the impact of claims on consumer perception

机译:“无棕榈油”与“可持续棕榈油”:索赔对消费者认知的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The palm oil debate has become highly polarised in recent years and is of crucial importance for multinationals and their policies. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the consumers' response towards product packs communicating this food ingredient in different ways: through "palm oil free" and "with sustainable palm oil" claims or without mentioning it. Design/methodology/approach A mail survey with a sample of 191 consumers was conducted. Respondents were equally and randomly distributed among the experimental conditions. The hypotheses were tested by a between-subjects factorial design. Findings Results revealed that consumer exposed to the "palm oil free" products showed a lower risk perception compared to those exposed to the "with sustainable palm oil" products and to products without claim. Moreover, the product evaluation was better in the "palm oil free" condition compared to the "with sustainable palm oil" condition. No differences emerged in attitude, expected tastiness and willingness to pay. Originality/value Results enrich the literature on food claims on pre-packaged foods as the source of information and on consumers' perception towards palm oil.
机译:目的近年来,关于棕榈油的争论已经高度分化,对跨国公司及其政策至关重要。本文的目的是调查消费者对通过不同方式传达这种食品成分的产品包装的反应:通过“无棕榈油”和“含可持续棕榈油”的声明或不提及它。设计/方法/方法进行了一次邮件调查,样本为191个消费者。在实验条件下,受访者均等且随机分布。假设通过对象间析因设计进行检验。结果结果显示,与“不含可持续棕榈油”产品和无索赔产品的消费者相比,接触“不含棕榈油”产品的消费者的风险感知度更低。此外,与“具有可持续棕榈油”条件相比,在“无棕榈油”条件下的产品评价更好。态度,预期的口味和支付意愿均未出现差异。创意/价值结果丰富了有关预包装食品作为信息来源的食品主张以及消费者对棕榈油的看法的文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号