首页> 外文期刊>Brain and cognition >Prediction error minimization: Implications for Embodied Cognition and the Extended Mind Hypothesis
【24h】

Prediction error minimization: Implications for Embodied Cognition and the Extended Mind Hypothesis

机译:预测误差最小化:对认知的理解和扩展的心理假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past few years, the prediction-error minimization (PEM) framework has increasingly been gaining ground throughout the cognitive sciences. A key issue dividing proponents of PEM is how we should conceptualize the relation between brain, body and environment. Clark advocates a version of PEM which retains, at least to a certain extent, his prior commitments to Embodied Cognition and to the Extended Mind Hypothesis. Hohwy, by contrast, presents a sustained argument that PEM actually rules out at least some versions of Embodied and Extended cognition. The aim of this paper is to facilitate a constructive debate between these two competing alternatives by explicating the different theoretical motivations underlying them, and by homing in on the relevant issues that may help to adjudicate between them.(C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在过去的几年中,最小化预测错误(PEM)框架在整个认知科学领域都日益普及。区分PEM支持者的关键问题是我们如何概念化大脑,身体与环境之间的关系。 Clark提倡一种PEM版本,该版本至少在一定程度上保留了他先前对实现认知和扩展思维假设的承诺。相比之下,Hohwy提出了一个持续的论点,即PEM实际上排除了至少某些版本的体现和扩展认知。本文的目的是通过阐明它们背后的不同理论动机,并通过探讨可能有助于在它们之间进行裁定的相关问题,来促进这两种竞争选择之间的建设性辩论。(C)2016 Elsevier Inc.版权所有保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号