首页> 外文期刊>Boundary-Layer Meteorology >Analysis of the Systematic Errors Found in the Kipp & Zonen Large-Aperture Scintillometer
【24h】

Analysis of the Systematic Errors Found in the Kipp & Zonen Large-Aperture Scintillometer

机译:Kipp&Zonen大口径闪烁仪中发现的系统误差的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Studies have shown a systematic error in the Kipp & Zonen large-aperture scintillometer (K&ZLAS) measurements of the sensible heat flux, H. We improved on these studies and compared four K&ZLASs with a Wageningen large-aperture scintillometer at the Chilbolton Observatory. The scintillometers were installed such that their footprints were the same and independent flux measurements were made along the measurement path. This allowed us to compare H and the direct scintillometer output, the refractive index structure parameter, Cn2{C_{n}^{2}} . Furthermore, spectral analysis was performed on the raw scintillometer signal to investigate the characteristics of the error. Firstly, correlation coefficients ≥ 0.99 confirm the robustness of the scintillometer method, and secondly we discovered two systematic errors: the low-Cn2{C_{n}^{2}} error and the high-Cn2{C_{n}^{2}} error. The low-Cn2{C_{n}^{2}} error is a non-linear error that is caused by high-frequency noise, and we suspect the error to be caused by the calibration circuit in the receiver. It varies between each K&ZLAS, is significant for H ≤ 50 W m−2, and we propose a solution to remove this error using the demodulated signal. The high-Cn2{C_{n}^{2}} error identified by us is the systematic error found in previous studies. We suspect this error to be caused by poor focal alignment of the receiver detector and the transmitter light-emitting diode that causes ineffective use of the Fresnel lens in the current Kipp & Zonen design. It varies between each K&ZLAS (35% up to 240%) and can only be removed by comparing with a reference scintillometer in the field.
机译:研究表明,在Kipp&Zonen大口径闪烁仪(K&ZLAS)的显热通量H的测量中存在系统误差。我们对这些研究进行了改进,并在Chilbolton天文台将四个K&ZLASs与Wageningen大口径闪烁仪进行了比较。闪烁计的安装方式应使其足迹相同,并沿测量路径进行独立的磁通量测量。这使我们可以比较H和直接闪烁仪的输出,折射率结构参数C n 2 {C_ {n} ^ {2}}。此外,对原始闪烁仪信号进行了频谱分析,以研究误差的特征。首先,相关系数≥0.99确认了闪烁仪方法的鲁棒性,其次,我们发现了两个系统误差:低C n 2 {C_ {n} ^ {2 }}错误和高C n 2 {C_ {n} ^ {2}}错误。低C n 2 {C_ {n} ^ {2}}错误是由高频噪声引起的非线性错误,我们怀疑由接收器中的校准电路引起的错误。它在每个K&ZLAS之间变化,对于H≤50 W m −2 有意义,我们提出了一种使用解调信号消除此误差的解决方案。我们确定的高C n 2 {C_ {n} ^ {2}}错误是先前研究中发现的系统错误。我们怀疑此错误是由于接收器检测器和发射器发光二极管的焦点对准不良而导致的,这导致当前的Kipp&Zonen设计中菲涅耳透镜的无效使用。它在每个K&ZLAS之间有所不同(35%到240%),并且只能通过与现场的参考闪烁仪比较才能将其删除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号