首页> 外文期刊>Biomedical signal processing and control >Looking beyond proportional control: The relevance of mode switching in learning to operate multi-articulating myoelectric upper-limb prostheses
【24h】

Looking beyond proportional control: The relevance of mode switching in learning to operate multi-articulating myoelectric upper-limb prostheses

机译:超越比例控制:模式转换在学习操作多关节肌电上肢假体中的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Operating a multi-articulating myoelectric prosthetic hand requires both proportional control of surface electromyography (sEMG) signals and accurately producing triggers to switch between grip types. Proportional control, used for hand opening/closing, has been studied extensively but the grip-switching control far less so. Can switching be trained and if so, how early on can improvement be seen? And is the ability to produce precise switches related to proficiency in proportional control? We examined individual learning differences, monitored improvements in switching control, and assessed whether skilful proportional control predicts proficient switching.Methods: Twenty-three unimpaired participants fitted with sEMG electrodes on the wrist flexors/extensors performed two 10-minute tasks: an adaptive virtual catching task (proportional control) and an sEMG-feedback-based switching task, with multiple performance measures being recorded and compared.Results: Most outcome measures revealed large individual differences, with 47-87% of the participants showing improvement in switching and 14% deteriorating. As hypothesized, no correlations were found between mode-switching and proportional-control skills.Conclusion: Learning to generate accurate grip-switching control proved difficult and might not be feasible for all individuals with upper-limb amputations. Unaffected participants showing proficient proportional control were not automatically good at producing well-tuned mode switches.Significance: In rehabilitation, clients with good proportional control are often offered a multi-articulating hand prosthesis. Since we found no clear associations between the proficiency in proportional movements and mode switches, this rationale may warrant reconsideration. Rather, when selecting the most optimal prosthesis, an individual's skills in both control types should be examined separately. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:目的:操作多关节肌电假肢手既需要对表面肌电图(sEMG)信号进行比例控制,又需要准确产生触发器以在握持类型之间进行切换。用于手的打开/关闭的比例控制已被广泛研究,但是手柄切换控制远未如此。可以对转换进行培训吗?如果可以的话,可以看到改进有多早?产生精确开关的能力是否与比例控制的熟练程度有关?我们检查了个体的学习差异,监测了切换控制的改进,并评估了熟练的比例控制是否可以预测熟练的切换。方法:二十三名在腕屈肌/伸肌上装有sEMG电极的无障碍参与者执行了两个10分钟的任务:自适应虚拟捕捉任务(比例控制)和基于sEMG反馈的切换任务,记录并比较了多个绩效指标。结果:大多数成果指标显示出较大的个体差异,其中47-87%的参与者表现出切换方面的改善,而14%的参与者恶化。如假设的那样,在模式切换和比例控制技能之间未发现任何相关性。结论:学会产生精确的抓地力切换控制非常困难,对于所有上肢截肢患者来说可能并不可行。未受影响的参与者显示出熟练的比例控制能力并不能自动适应调节模式的变化。意义:在康复过程中,具有良好比例控制能力的患者通常会得到多关节手假体。由于我们发现比例运动的熟练程度与模式切换之间没有明确的关联,因此此理由可能值得重新考虑。相反,在选择最合适的假体时,应该分别检查个人在两种控制类型中的技能。 (C)2019由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号