首页> 外文期刊>Behavior Research Methods >Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire
【24h】

Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire

机译:在线和纸笔铅笔测验的非等效性:前瞻性记忆问卷的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is growing evidence that Internet-mediated psychological tests can have satisfactory psychometric properties and can measure the same constructs as traditional versions. However, equivalence cannot be taken for granted. The prospective memory questionnaire (PMQ; Hannon, Adams, Harrington, Fries-Dias, & Gibson, 1995) was used in an on-line study exploring links between drug use and memory (Rodgers et al., 2003). The PMQ has four factor-analytically derived subscales. In a large (N = 763) sample tested via the Internet, only two factors could be recovered; the other two subscales were essentially meaningless. This demonstration of nonequivalence underlines the importance of on-line test validation. Without examination of its psychometric properties, one cannot be sure that a test administered via the Internet actually measures the intended construct.
机译:越来越多的证据表明,互联网介导的心理测验可以具有令人满意的心理测验特性,并且可以测量与传统测验相同的结构。但是,不能认为等同是理所当然的。前瞻性记忆问卷(PMQ; Hannon,Adams,Harrington,Fries-Dias和Gibson,1995)用于在线研究,探讨药物使用与记忆之间的联系(Rodgers等,2003)。 PMQ具有四个因子分析得出的子量表。在通过互联网测试的大型(N = 763)样本中,只能恢复两个因素。其他两个分量表本质上是没有意义的。这种不对等的证明强调了在线测试验证的重要性。如果不检查其心理测量特性,就无法确定通过Internet进行的测试实际上是否可以测量预期的结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号