首页> 外文期刊>Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE/ACM Transactions on >Relative Acoustic Transfer Function Estimation in Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks
【24h】

Relative Acoustic Transfer Function Estimation in Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks

机译:无线声学传感器网络中的相对声学传递函数估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we present an algorithm to estimate the relative acoustic transfer function (RTF) of a target source in wireless acoustic sensor networks (WASNs). Two well-known methods to estimate the RTF are the covariance subtraction (CS) method and the covariance whitening (CW) approach, the latter based on the generalized eigenvalue decomposition. Both methods depend on the use of the noisy correlation matrix, which, in practice, has to be estimated using limited and (in WASNs) quantized data. The bit rate and the fact that we use limited data records therefore directly affect the accuracy of the estimated RTFs. Therefore, we first theoretically analyze the estimation performance of the two approaches in terms of bit rate. Second, we propose a rate-distribution method by minimizing the power usage and constraining the expected estimation error for both RTF estimators. The optimal rate distributions are found by using convex optimization techniques. The model-based methods, however, are impractical due to the dependence on the true RTFs. We therefore further develop two greedy rate-distribution methods for both approaches. Finally, numerical simulations on synthetic data and real audio recordings show the superiority of the proposed approaches in power usage compared to uniform rate allocation. We find that in order to satisfy the same RTF estimation accuracy, the rate-distributed CW methods consume much less transmission energy than the CS-based methods.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了一种算法,用于估计无线声传感器网络(WASN)中目标源的相对声传递函数(RTF)。估计RTF的两种众所周知的方法是协方差减法(CS)和协方差白化(CW)方法,后者基于广义特征值分解。两种方法都依赖于噪声相关矩阵的使用,实际上,必须使用有限的(在WASN中)量化数据来估计噪声相关矩阵。因此,比特率和我们使用有限的数据记录这一事实直接影响了估计的RTF的准确性。因此,我们首先从理论上分析两种方法在比特率方面的估计性能。其次,我们通过最小化功耗并限制两个RTF估计器的预期估计误差,提出了一种速率分配方法。通过使用凸优化技术可以找到最佳速率分布。但是,由于依赖于真实的RTF,因此基于模型的方法不切实际。因此,我们针对这两种方法进一步开发了两种贪婪率分布方法。最后,对合成数据和真实音频记录的数值模拟表明,与统一速率分配相比,所提出的方法在功耗方面具有优势。我们发现,为了满足相同的RTF估计精度,速率分布的CW方法比基于CS的方法消耗更少的传输能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号