首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Comparison of different model approaches for the simulation of multiphase processes
【24h】

Comparison of different model approaches for the simulation of multiphase processes

机译:用于多相过程仿真的不同模型方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cloud-chemistry models are developed intensively with increasing complexity, leading to new knowledge and offering new possibilities to understand the physico-chemical processes taking place in the atmosphere. Intercomparing such detailed models is the way to test the robustness and reliability of their parameterizations and numerical schemes. The present study involves newly developed parcel models treating microphysics and chemistry with equal rigor. The description of both kinds of processes is given for a size-resolved particle/droplet spectrum. Three different types of models are compared. In the SPACCIM approach, one- and two-dimensional particle/drop microphysical schemes are used in a time-splitting setup between chemistry and microphysics. The GALERKIN model employs a one-dimensional scheme in a fully coupled setup. For each of the three types, "fixed bin" and "moving bin" approaches are implemented. A comparison between "fixed" and "moving bin" approaches makes sense only for scenarios without coagulation and breakup. The paper focuses on the effects of different microphysical and numerical approaches on the multiphase chemistry. The resulting changes in the particle/droplet composition feed back on cloud microphysics. Substantiated conclusions can only be derived if these effects are studied for a wide range of cases. Thus, the simulations are performed for three chemical reaction mechanisms of different complexity and four scenarios derived from field measurements. The interaction between numerical schemes, microphysics and multiphase chemistry is discussed. Mostly, the results of the participating models agree in an appreciable way. Observable differences are noticed between the "moving bin" approach and models using fixed grids for the discretization of the particle/droplet spectrum. Furthermore, the initial aerosol composition influences the fate of chemical species as well as the behavior of the numerical solver in a substantial way.
机译:云化学模型的开发日趋复杂,其复杂性不断提高,从而带来了新的知识,并为了解大气中发生的物理化学过程提供了新的可能性。比较这些详细模型是测试其参数化和数值方案的鲁棒性和可靠性的方法。本研究涉及新开发的包裹模型,该模型以相同的严格度处理微观物理和化学。给出了两种方法的描述,用于尺寸分辨的颗粒/液滴光谱。比较了三种不同类型的模型。在SPACCIM方法中,化学和微观物理学之间的时间分割设置中使用了一维和二维的粒子/液滴微观物理学方案。 GALERKIN模型在完全耦合的设置中采用一维方案。对于这三种类型的每一种,都实现了“固定箱”和“移动箱”方法。 “固定”和“移动箱”方法之间的比较仅对没有凝结和破裂的情况才有意义。本文重点研究了不同的微观物理和数值方法对多相化学的影响。粒子/液滴组成的最终变化将反馈给云微观物理学。只有在广泛的情况下研究这些影响,才能得出有根据的结论。因此,对三种不同复杂度的化学反应机理和从现场测量中得出的四种情况进行了仿真。讨论了数值方案,微观物理学和多相化学之间的相互作用。通常,参与模型的结果在某种程度上是一致的。在“移动箱”方法与使用固定网格进行粒子/液滴光谱离散化的模型之间发现了明显的差异。此外,初始气溶胶成分会在很大程度上影响化学物种的命运以及数值求解器的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号