首页> 外文会议>International conference on computational and experimental methods in multiphase and complex flow >Comparison of drift-flux and multi-fluid approaches to modeling of multiphase flow in oil and gas wells
【24h】

Comparison of drift-flux and multi-fluid approaches to modeling of multiphase flow in oil and gas wells

机译:油气井多相流建模中的漂移通量和多流体方法比较

获取原文

摘要

Multiphase flows in wellbores and pipes can be described within the framework of two major approaches, namely, the multi-fluid approach and the drift-flux approach. The fundamental difference between the approaches is in the formulation of the momentum conservation equations in the mathematical model. Within the multi-fluid model, a set of mass and momentum conservation equations is written for each phase in the continuum approximation, while the drift-flux model offers a single momentum equation for the mixture as a whole in terms of the volume-averaged velocity of the mixture. Both approaches require closure relations derived from and tuned with respect to laboratory data. In this work, we compare both approaches and apply them to solve the transient problem of terrain induced slugging relevant to the field of well testing and production and compare performance of the models.
机译:井筒和管道中的多相流可以在两种主要方法的框架内进行描述,即多流体方法和漂移通量方法。两种方法之间的根本区别在于数学模型中动量守恒方程的制定。在多流体模型中,在连续近似中为每个相写了一组质量和动量守恒方程,而漂移通量模型在体积平均速度方面为混合物整体提供了一个动量方程。的混合物。两种方法都需要从实验室数据导出并针对实验室数据进行调整的闭合关系。在这项工作中,我们将比较这两种方法,并将其应用于解决与试井和生产领域相关的地形引起的击打的瞬态问题,并比较模型的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号