首页> 外文期刊>Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. Section A, Sciences >Ultrasonic‑Assisted Extraction of Phalerin from Phaleria macrocarpa:Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network Modelling
【24h】

Ultrasonic‑Assisted Extraction of Phalerin from Phaleria macrocarpa:Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network Modelling

机译:来自蛋白酶宏观的超声波辅助提取蛋白酶:响应面方法和人工神经网络建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Phaleria macrocarpa is historically treasured remedy for treating various allergies, infections and health complications. Commercial availability of this plant extract, however, remains limited as conventional phytochemical extraction techniques require prolong extraction time, high consumption of solvents, in conjunction to being energy intensive. Herein, this study aimed to statistically optimize the ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of phalerin from P. macrocarpa using the Box–Behnken design (BBD) and the predictive capability of this approach was compared to a model derived from artificial neural network (ANN). In the optimization experiment, for only three relevant UAE parameters viz. solvent ratio, extraction temperature and solid-to-solvent ratio were examined, for the response of the highest extraction of phalerin. Under an optimized condition (R~2 = 0.98) [71% methanol, 1:45 solid-to-solvent ratio (g/mL) and extraction temperature of 47°C], a satisfactory amount of 4.26 ± 0.51 mg/g of phalerin was attained. Comparison between the RSM and ANN revealed the latter being a better predictive model and yielded an appreciably higher predictive capability (R~2 = 0.99) in terms of average absolute deviation, AAD (0.24%) versus RSM (AAD = 1.03%).
机译:Phaleria Macrocarpa是历史上珍贵的补救措施,用于治疗各种过敏,感染和健康并发症。然而,这种植物提取物的商业可用性仍然有限,因为常规的植物化学提取技术需要延长提取时间,溶剂的高消耗,以及能量密集。在此,该研究旨在使用Box-Behnken Design(BBD)统计从P. Macrocarpa的杂种素的超声辅助萃取(UAE),并将这种方法的预测能力与来自人工神经网络的模型进行了比较(ANN )。在优化实验中,仅为三个相关的UAE参数viz。检查溶剂率,提取温度和固 - 溶剂比,用于响应苯丙醛的最高提取。在优化条件下(R〜2 = 0.98)[71%甲醇,1:45固体 - 溶剂比(G / ml)和47°C的提取温度,令人满意的量为4.26±0.51mg / g达到了苯丙烯。 RSM和ANN之间的比较揭示了后者是更好的预测模型,并在平均绝对偏差方面产生明显更高的预测性能力(R〜2 = 0.99),AAD(0.24%)与RSM(AAD = 1.03%)。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Bioprocess & Polymer Engineering School of Chemical & Energy Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Johor Bahru Malaysia;

    Department of Bioprocess & Polymer Engineering School of Chemical & Energy Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Johor Bahru Malaysia;

    Department of Chemistry Faculty of Science Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Johor Bahru Malaysia Enzyme Technology and Green Synthesis Group Faculty of Science Universiti Teknologi 81310 UTM Johor Bahru Malaysia;

    Institute of Bioscience Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 Serdang Selangor Malaysia;

    Centre For Drug Research Universiti Sains Malaysia 11800 USM Pulau Pinang Malaysia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Phaleria macrocarpa; BBD; RSM; ANN; Ultrasonic-assisted extraction; Phalerin;

    机译:Phaleria macrocarpa;BBD;RSM;安;超声波辅助提取;Phalerinae.;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:04:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号