首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Modelling fuel demand for different socio-economic groups
【24h】

Modelling fuel demand for different socio-economic groups

机译:模拟不同社会经济群体的燃料需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The fuel demand literature provides a range of estimates of the long and short-run price and income elasticities of gasoline demand for different countries and states. These estimates can be very useful in predicting the overall impacts of policy approaches designed to reduce fuel consumption and to address concerns of carbon emissions or energy security. However, analysis of policy options based on elasticities that are homogenous across income groups provides no information about the relative distributional burden that may be faced by different sectors of the population. Different responses to the same change in price or income are likely to occur, dependent on both travel needs and income levels. This paper estimates gasoline demand elasticities for different income quintiles in the United States to test for heterogeneity in demand response. Group wise summary consumer expenditure data for 20 years is used to derive the elasticity estimates. The results show that the elasticities do vary across groups and follow a U-pattern from the lowest to the highest income quintile. The lowest income quintile is found to have the largest price elasticity. The lowest and the highest income quintiles appear to be statistically insensitive to any changes in income. The rebound effect also follows the U-pattern, with the highest rebound observed among the wealthiest households. Rural households appear to have lower price elasticity than households in urban areas.
机译:燃料需求文献提供了不同国家和州对汽油需求的长期和短期价格以及收入弹性的一系列估计。这些估计对于预测旨在减少燃料消耗和解决碳排放或能源安全问题的政策方法的总体影响非常有用。但是,基于不同收入群体之间的弹性进行的政策选择分析无法提供有关人口不同部门可能面临的相对分配负担的信息。对相同价格或收入变化的不同反应可能会发生,这取决于旅行需求和收入水平。本文估算了美国不同收入五分位数的汽油需求弹性,以测试需求响应中的异质性。使用20年的分组明智的消费者支出摘要数据得出弹性估计值。结果表明,弹性系数在各个群体之间确实有所不同,并且遵循从收入最低的五分位数到收入最高的五分位数的U型格局。收入最低的五分之一人口具有最大的价格弹性。收入最低和最高的五分位数似乎对收入的任何变化都不敏感。反弹效果也遵循U型模式,在最富有的家庭中,反弹率最高。农村家庭的价格弹性似乎比城市家庭低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2009年第12期|2740-2749|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh;

    Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK;

    Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Ave, New Brunswick, NJ, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    fuel demand; elasticity; income distribution;

    机译:燃料需求;弹性;收入分配;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:10:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号